Bellarmine

13-19

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

3.9%Bellarmine

96.1%High Point

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADHigh Point -23.8

PROJECTED TOTAL166.4

MODEL MONEYLINEHigh Point -2464

High Point

31-5

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreBellarmine 71

Projected Total166.4

Projected ScoreHigh Point 95

Team Comparison

BellarmineMetricHigh Point

44.9MMH Power Index69

119.6Offensive Efficiency123.8

122.1Defensive Efficiency98.3

-2.5Net Efficiency25.5

-2.8Strength of Schedule-5.8

0.3Last 10 Net Efficiency16.5

66.9Tempo72.4

60.0%Effective FG%56.6%

15.3%Turnover Rate12.8%

22.7%Offensive Rebound %33.2%

35.3%Free Throw Rate42.4%

-1.7Average Margin18.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

High Point HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY96.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHigh Point holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (69.0–44.9), offensive efficiency (123.8–119.6), defensive efficiency (98.3–122.1), net efficiency (25.5–-2.5).

Bellarmine COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-2.8–-5.8), shooting efficiency (60.0–56.6).

Final

Bellarmine

85—90

High Point

High Point by 5 • 68.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

BellarmineTEAM STATHigh Point

28-56FG30-57

50.0%FG%53.0%

8-183PT7-23

44.0%3PT%30.0%

21-24FT23-29

88.0%FT%79.0%

29Rebounds29

11Offensive Rebounds11

15Assists15

11Turnovers9

5Steals7

4Blocks3

22Fouls17

Player Box Score

Bellarmine

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Ben Johnson	G	35	12-20	2-5	6-6	7	1	2	0	32
Peter Suder	G	31	7-11	1-1	3-4	6	6	0	0	18
Alec Pfriem	Guard	29	5-9	3-5	2-2	2	2	2	0	15
Billy Smith	G	26	2-6	2-3	4-4	0	1	0	1	10
Garrett Tipton	Guard	38	1-6	0-4	4-4	2	3	0	0	6
Langdon Hatton	Center	26	1-4	0-0	2-4	5	0	0	3	4
Landin Hacker	Guard	15	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	2	1	0	0

High Point

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Kimani Hamilton	F	35	6-10	1-3	10-10	6	1	3	2	23
Duke Miles	G	28	6-12	0-3	4-5	1	4	1	0	16
Abdoulaye Thiam	Guard	22	5-9	2-4	2-2	2	1	1	0	14
Kezza Giffa	G	32	3-8	2-4	4-5	2	6	1	0	12
Trae Benham	Guard	31	3-9	2-7	2-2	1	1	0	0	10
Juslin Bodo Bodo	C	23	5-5	0-0	0-3	9	0	1	1	10
Cade Potter	Forward	17	2-3	0-1	1-2	5	1	0	0	5
Titas Sargiunas	F	12	0-1	0-1	0-0	2	1	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

68.1Possessions68.1

124.8Offensive Efficiency132.2

132.2Defensive Efficiency124.8

-7.3Net Efficiency7.3

57.1%Effective FG%58.8%

63.1%True Shooting %63.6%

16.3%Turnover Rate13.1%

42.9%Free Throw Rate50.9%

32.1%3-Point Rate40.4%

1.36Assist / Turnover1.67

Game Summary

High Point won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 68.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.