Chattanooga

13-19

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

7.1%Chattanooga

92.9%Auburn

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADAuburn -15.7

PROJECTED TOTAL160.6

MODEL MONEYLINEAuburn -1308

Auburn

21-16

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreChattanooga 72

Projected Total160.6

Projected ScoreAuburn 88

Team Comparison

ChattanoogaMetricAuburn

45.9MMH Power Index64.4

112.7Offensive Efficiency118.8

110.5Defensive Efficiency113.0

2.2Net Efficiency5.8

-4.4Strength of Schedule7.5

-0.1Last 10 Net Efficiency8.0

68.1Tempo69.8

55.1%Effective FG%53.1%

14.1%Turnover Rate14.5%

23.5%Offensive Rebound %36.5%

29.2%Free Throw Rate43.8%

1.4Average Margin4.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Auburn HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY92.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMAuburn holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (64.4–45.9), offensive efficiency (118.8–112.7), net efficiency (5.8–2.2), strength of schedule (7.5–-4.4).

Chattanooga COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (110.5–113.0), shooting efficiency (55.1–53.1), ball security (14.1–14.5).

Final

Chattanooga

66—101

Auburn

Auburn by 35 • 70.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

ChattanoogaTEAM STATAuburn

22-61FG37-66

36.0%FG%56.0%

11-333PT11-25

33.0%3PT%44.0%

11-16FT16-21

69.0%FT%76.0%

23Rebounds46

7Offensive Rebounds15

16Assists23

10Turnovers9

5Steals7

3Blocks8

18Fouls14

Player Box Score

Chattanooga

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Honor Huff	G	31	4-8	4-8	3-3	2	4	0	0	15
Sam Alexis	F	23	5-11	1-2	2-4	6	0	1	3	13
Trey Bonham	Guard	32	2-12	1-4	4-4	4	3	2	0	9
Jan Zidek	Forward	19	3-7	1-5	0-0	2	3	1	0	7
Demetrius Davis	Forward	20	2-3	2-3	0-0	0	0	0	0	6
Noah Melson	G	18	2-6	1-3	1-2	0	0	1	0	6
Myles Che	G	11	2-2	0-0	1-3	1	2	0	0	5
Randy Brady	F	16	1-2	1-1	0-0	2	2	0	0	3
Tyler Millin	Forward	23	1-8	0-5	0-0	3	0	0	0	2
Rudy Fitzgibbons III	Guard	7	0-2	0-2	0-0	0	2	0	0	0

Auburn

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jaylin Williams	Forward	18	9-9	2-2	1-1	5	1	1	0	21
Johni Broome	Forward	20	9-12	0-1	0-1	8	0	0	4	18
Chad Baker-Mazara	G	16	4-7	3-5	2-2	1	2	1	0	13
Aden Holloway	G	22	2-10	2-8	2-2	4	5	0	0	8
Chaney Johnson	Forward	20	3-4	1-1	0-0	5	2	3	1	7
Dylan Cardwell	Center	18	3-5	0-0	1-2	9	1	1	3	7
K.D. Johnson	Guard	19	2-4	2-2	0-0	1	1	0	0	6
Chris Moore	Forward	18	2-2	0-0	2-2	1	5	0	0	6
Tre Donaldson	G	16	1-3	0-1	4-4	2	4	0	0	6
Denver Jones	Guard	19	2-5	1-4	0-0	3	2	1	0	5
Blake Muschalek	G	2	0-0	0-0	3-5	0	0	0	0	3
Lior Berman	Guard	6	0-4	0-1	1-2	3	0	0	0	1
Addarin Scott	F	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	0
Carter Sobera	Guard	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Jalen Harper	Guard	2	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

70.8Possessions70.8

93.2Offensive Efficiency142.7

142.7Defensive Efficiency93.2

-49.4Net Efficiency49.4

45.1%Effective FG%64.4%

48.1%True Shooting %66.5%

14.0%Turnover Rate12.9%

26.2%Free Throw Rate31.8%

54.1%3-Point Rate37.9%

1.60Assist / Turnover2.56

Game Summary

Auburn won by 35 points. The game played at approximately 70.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.