UAB logo

UAB

20-12
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
91.9%UAB
8.1%UTSA
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUAB -15.4
PROJECTED TOTAL154.0
MODEL MONEYLINEUAB -1135
UTSA logo

UTSA

5-25
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUAB 85
Projected Total154.0
Projected ScoreUTSA 69

Team Comparison

UABMetricUTSA
56.9MMH Power Index30.5
110.5Offensive Efficiency99.0
102.9Defensive Efficiency115.0
7.6Net Efficiency-16.0
0.4Strength of Schedule-1.2
2.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-17.6
71.7Tempo70.2
48.8%Effective FG%45.9%
12.4%Turnover Rate17.0%
32.7%Offensive Rebound %30.9%
36.9%Free Throw Rate29.9%
5.4Average Margin-11.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

UAB HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY91.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
11–0
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUAB holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.9–30.5), offensive efficiency (110.5–99.0), defensive efficiency (102.9–115.0), net efficiency (7.6–-16.0).
Final
UAB logo
UAB
78—76
UTSA logo
UTSA
UAB by 2 • 75.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UABTEAM STATUTSA
26-64FG27-68
41.0%FG%40.0%
11-203PT9-22
55.0%3PT%41.0%
15-18FT13-19
83.0%FT%68.0%
49Rebounds35
17Offensive Rebounds13
16Assists12
20Turnovers11
5Steals9
8Blocks6
18Fouls16

Player Box Score

UAB
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Yaxel LendeborgF405-105-68-8151170023
Butta JohnsonG337-111-22-344000017
Daniel OrtizGuard233-113-52-233100011
Eric GainesGuard394-132-60-056300010
Christian ColemanG133-50-00-15001006
Javian DavisForward192-70-00-08000004
Alejandro VasquezGuard101-60-11-22000003
Tony ToneyGuard151-10-00-02200002
Will ShaverC40-00-02-20000002
Barry Dunning Jr.G40-00-00-00000000
UTSA
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jordan Ivy-CurryGuard296-192-66-7104100020
Christian TuckerGuard396-91-12-233200015
Dre Fuller Jr.Guard226-123-60-041220015
Trey EdmondsCenter273-120-01-45110007
Adante' HolimanG241-51-42-32110005
Carlton Linguard Jr.Center232-51-30-14002005
Isaiah WyattGuard222-41-20-04220005
Massal DioufForward121-20-02-21002004
Chandler CuthrellF20-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

75.3Possessions75.3
103.6Offensive Efficiency100.9
100.9Defensive Efficiency103.6
2.7Net Efficiency-2.7
49.2%Effective FG%46.3%
53.8%True Shooting %49.3%
26.5%Turnover Rate14.7%
28.1%Free Throw Rate27.9%
31.3%3-Point Rate32.4%
0.80Assist / Turnover1.09
Game Summary
UAB won by 2 points. The game played at approximately 75.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Turnover Rate, Net Efficiency, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.