Chattanooga

13-19

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

19.4%Chattanooga

80.6%Samford

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADSamford -9.2

PROJECTED TOTAL155.8

MODEL MONEYLINESamford -415

Samford

18-14

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreChattanooga 73

Projected Total155.8

Projected ScoreSamford 83

Team Comparison

ChattanoogaMetricSamford

45.9MMH Power Index54.1

112.7Offensive Efficiency113.5

110.5Defensive Efficiency108.3

2.2Net Efficiency5.2

-4.4Strength of Schedule-2.9

-0.1Last 10 Net Efficiency14.0

68.1Tempo69.5

55.1%Effective FG%54.0%

14.1%Turnover Rate13.3%

23.5%Offensive Rebound %25.3%

29.2%Free Throw Rate42.5%

1.4Average Margin3.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Samford HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY80.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSamford holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.1–45.9), offensive efficiency (113.5–112.7), defensive efficiency (108.3–110.5), net efficiency (5.2–2.2).

Chattanooga COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (55.1–54.0).

Final

Chattanooga

74—89

Samford

Samford by 15 • 72.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

ChattanoogaTEAM STATSamford

25-56FG29-58

45.0%FG%50.0%

11-313PT17-34

35.0%3PT%50.0%

13-17FT14-18

76.0%FT%78.0%

39Rebounds26

12Offensive Rebounds4

12Assists20

21Turnovers10

5Steals12

1Blocks2

14Fouls17

Player Box Score

Chattanooga

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Trey Bonham	Guard	33	7-11	4-5	3-4	6	3	0	0	21
Honor Huff	G	38	6-12	4-10	2-2	4	0	0	0	18
Sam Alexis	F	23	4-8	1-3	1-2	6	1	0	1	10
Demetrius Davis	Forward	19	3-6	1-4	0-0	3	1	3	0	7
Randy Brady	F	18	0-1	0-0	4-4	5	3	0	0	4
Myles Che	G	17	2-5	0-1	0-1	1	2	1	0	4
Jan Zidek	Forward	14	1-5	0-2	2-2	1	2	0	0	4
Noah Melson	G	19	1-3	1-3	0-0	1	0	1	0	3
Tyler Millin	Forward	19	1-5	0-3	1-2	6	0	0	0	3

Samford

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
AJ Staton-McCray	G	26	9-12	6-6	5-6	5	1	2	0	29
Achor Achor	F	30	7-8	1-2	5-6	3	2	1	1	20
Chandler Leopard	Guard	10	4-5	4-5	0-0	1	0	0	0	12
Garrett Hicks	Guard	23	3-6	3-5	2-2	2	4	0	0	11
Rylan Jones	Guard	30	2-7	1-3	0-0	3	6	2	0	5
Jaden Campbell	Guard	23	2-6	1-5	0-0	2	1	2	0	5
Josh Holloway	G	12	1-6	1-4	2-4	0	1	2	0	5
Dallas Graziani	Guard	15	1-3	0-1	0-0	1	5	2	0	2
Nathan Johnson	Forward	12	0-2	0-2	0-0	3	0	0	0	0
Riley Allenspach	F	9	0-1	0-0	0-0	3	0	1	0	0
Lukas Walls	G	9	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Zach Loveday	Center	1	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	1	0

Advanced Game Stats

72.9Possessions72.9

101.5Offensive Efficiency122.1

122.1Defensive Efficiency101.5

-20.6Net Efficiency20.6

54.5%Effective FG%64.7%

57.7%True Shooting %66.9%

28.7%Turnover Rate13.8%

30.4%Free Throw Rate31.0%

55.4%3-Point Rate58.6%

0.57Assist / Turnover2.00

Game Summary

Samford won by 15 points. The game played at approximately 72.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.