
Fairleigh Dickinson
11-21GAME THAT MATTERSAT
9.8%Fairleigh Dickinson
90.2%Merrimack
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMerrimack -14.1
PROJECTED TOTAL134.7
MODEL MONEYLINEMerrimack -920

Merrimack
23-11MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreFairleigh Dickinson 60
Projected Total134.7
Projected ScoreMerrimack 74
Team Comparison
38.3MMH Power Index53.7
103.8Offensive Efficiency106.4
108.4Defensive Efficiency103.2
-4.6Net Efficiency3.2
-5.8Strength of Schedule0.7
-4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency12.9
64.7Tempo64.4
48.6%Effective FG%49.3%
18.2%Turnover Rate14.8%
33.6%Offensive Rebound %24.7%
33.1%Free Throw Rate39.5%
-3.0Average Margin2.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Merrimack HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY90.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.7–38.3), offensive efficiency (106.4–103.8), defensive efficiency (103.2–108.4), net efficiency (3.2–-4.6).
Fairleigh Dickinson COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (33.6–24.7).