Central Connecticut

18-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

55.4%Central Connecticut

44.6%Stonehill

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADCentral Connecticut -0.4

PROJECTED TOTAL139.5

MODEL MONEYLINECentral Connecticut -124

Stonehill

12-21

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreCentral Connecticut 70

Projected Total139.5

Projected ScoreStonehill 70

Team Comparison

Central ConnecticutMetricStonehill

44.4MMH Power Index37.9

111.4Offensive Efficiency97.5

107.0Defensive Efficiency100.7

4.4Net Efficiency-3.2

-7.7Strength of Schedule-5.4

-0.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-3.4

66.3Tempo68.1

54.0%Effective FG%48.0%

15.9%Turnover Rate19.1%

28.2%Offensive Rebound %28.4%

31.3%Free Throw Rate29.2%

2.9Average Margin-2.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Central Connecticut HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY55.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCentral Connecticut holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (44.4–37.9), offensive efficiency (111.4–97.5), net efficiency (4.4–-3.2), recent form (-0.5–-3.4).

Stonehill COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (100.7–107.0), strength of schedule (-5.4–-7.7), offensive rebounding (28.4–28.2).

Final

Central Connecticut

74—59

Stonehill

Central Connecticut by 15 • 71.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Central ConnecticutTEAM STATStonehill

27-63FG24-59

43.0%FG%41.0%

6-283PT6-19

21.0%3PT%32.0%

14-19FT5-9

74.0%FT%56.0%

40Rebounds36

12Offensive Rebounds10

11Assists8

11Turnovers18

14Steals8

5Blocks3

13Fouls12

Player Box Score

Central Connecticut

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Kellen Amos	Guard	32	8-14	2-6	2-2	1	0	3	1	20
Jordan Jones	Guard	36	4-13	3-8	5-6	5	4	3	0	16
Jayden Brown	Forward	16	3-4	0-1	0-0	2	0	0	1	6
Tre Breland	Guard	32	2-11	0-7	1-1	10	3	3	1	5
Joe Ostrowsky	Guard	28	2-4	1-3	0-0	3	1	2	0	5
Davonte Sweatman	Guard	15	0-2	0-2	0-0	4	1	1	1	0
Abdul Momoh	F	10	0-2	0-0	0-0	4	0	0	1	0

Stonehill

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Chas Stinson	G	35	6-14	2-2	3-4	8	1	2	0	17
Max Zegarowski	Forward	28	4-12	1-2	2-2	5	1	0	0	11
Todd Brogna	F	30	4-8	2-5	0-0	6	1	0	1	10
Se'yphon Triplett	Guard	16	4-6	0-0	0-0	2	0	2	0	8
Thatcher Stone	G	28	2-6	0-2	0-1	2	4	0	0	4
Neal Marquardt	Forward	14	2-3	0-0	0-2	5	1	0	1	4
Nathan McGill	Guard	19	1-3	1-2	0-0	5	0	0	0	3
Louie Semona III	F	28	1-6	0-5	0-0	3	0	2	1	2
Austin Abrams	Guard	2	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	2	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

71.2Possessions71.2

103.9Offensive Efficiency82.9

82.9Defensive Efficiency103.9

21.1Net Efficiency-21.1

47.6%Effective FG%45.8%

51.4%True Shooting %46.6%

15.5%Turnover Rate25.3%

30.2%Free Throw Rate15.3%

44.4%3-Point Rate32.2%

1.00Assist / Turnover0.44

Game Summary

Central Connecticut won by 15 points. The game played at approximately 71.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.