Rider

4-25

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

5.0%Rider

95.0%Quinnipiac

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADQuinnipiac -20.6

PROJECTED TOTAL143.8

MODEL MONEYLINEQuinnipiac -1900

Quinnipiac

19-13

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreRider 62

Projected Total143.8

Projected ScoreQuinnipiac 82

Team Comparison

RiderMetricQuinnipiac

29.1MMH Power Index51

96.3Offensive Efficiency106.8

115.3Defensive Efficiency102.1

-19.0Net Efficiency4.7

-0.9Strength of Schedule-2.3

-17.7Last 10 Net Efficiency2.2

65.9Tempo70.5

43.4%Effective FG%48.9%

17.1%Turnover Rate15.6%

32.8%Offensive Rebound %34.1%

31.5%Free Throw Rate34.1%

-12.6Average Margin3.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Quinnipiac HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY95.0%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQuinnipiac holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.0–29.1), offensive efficiency (106.8–96.3), defensive efficiency (102.1–115.3), net efficiency (4.7–-19.0).

Rider COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-0.9–-2.3).

Final

Rider

84—88

Quinnipiac

Quinnipiac by 4 • 78.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

RiderTEAM STATQuinnipiac

33-69FG30-69

48.0%FG%43.0%

7-163PT10-25

44.0%3PT%40.0%

11-17FT18-22

65.0%FT%82.0%

35Rebounds37

10Offensive Rebounds13

20Assists20

13Turnovers10

6Steals9

7Blocks3

15Fouls16

Player Box Score

Rider

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Mervin James	Forward	38	13-19	0-1	5-6	9	1	1	0	31
T.J. Weeks Jr.	Guard	35	6-14	5-8	2-2	7	1	1	1	19
Corey McKeithan	Guard	36	5-10	1-3	0-0	4	8	3	1	11
Allen Powell	Guard	39	3-11	1-4	1-2	2	4	0	0	8
Tariq Ingraham	F	22	3-7	0-0	1-3	6	2	0	3	7
Jeffrey Langston Jr.	Forward	18	3-6	0-0	1-2	2	2	1	2	7
DJ Dudley	Guard	10	0-2	0-0	1-2	2	1	0	0	1
Anthony McCall	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	0

Quinnipiac

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Matt Balanc	Guard	38	10-20	5-11	4-4	5	1	1	0	29
Paul Otieno	F	34	10-12	0-0	4-5	9	0	2	0	24
Amarri Monroe	F	30	4-9	2-4	4-4	6	0	1	2	14
Savion Lewis	Guard	39	3-9	2-2	4-4	3	17	2	0	12
Alexis Reyes	Forward	23	2-7	1-3	0-0	5	0	0	1	5
Doug Young	G	13	1-4	0-1	1-1	1	2	1	0	3
Khaden Bennett	G	13	0-4	0-3	1-4	4	0	2	0	1
Richie Springs	Forward	4	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Daemar Kelly	G	4	0-2	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
JJ Riggins	Forward	2	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

78.3Possessions78.3

107.3Offensive Efficiency112.4

112.4Defensive Efficiency107.3

-5.1Net Efficiency5.1

52.9%Effective FG%50.7%

54.5%True Shooting %55.4%

16.2%Turnover Rate13.1%

24.6%Free Throw Rate31.9%

23.2%3-Point Rate36.2%

1.54Assist / Turnover2.00

Game Summary

Quinnipiac won by 4 points. The game played at approximately 78.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.