Delaware logo

Delaware

10-21
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
6.3%Delaware
93.7%Hofstra
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHofstra -18.8
PROJECTED TOTAL142.0
MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -1487
Hofstra logo

Hofstra

24-11
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreDelaware 62
Projected Total142.0
Projected ScoreHofstra 80

Team Comparison

39.7MMH Power Index59.3
103.3Offensive Efficiency114.0
112.9Defensive Efficiency100.9
-9.6Net Efficiency13.1
3.4Strength of Schedule-2.9
-9.8Last 10 Net Efficiency14.0
65.5Tempo66.2
52.9%Effective FG%52.2%
18.4%Turnover Rate16.1%
20.5%Offensive Rebound %35.0%
31.2%Free Throw Rate32.0%
-6.3Average Margin8.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Hofstra HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY93.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.3–39.7), offensive efficiency (114.0–103.3), defensive efficiency (100.9–112.9), net efficiency (13.1–-9.6).
Delaware COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (3.4–-2.9), shooting efficiency (52.9–52.2).
Final
Delaware logo
Delaware
71—76
Hofstra logo
Hofstra
Hofstra by 5 • 70.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

DelawareTEAM STATHofstra
26-63FG29-64
41.0%FG%45.0%
11-303PT9-31
37.0%3PT%29.0%
8-14FT9-11
57.0%FT%82.0%
40Rebounds36
12Offensive Rebounds8
19Assists19
13Turnovers9
5Steals6
—Blocks6
14Fouls14

Player Box Score

Delaware
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Christian RayGuard317-102-44-6100200020
Jyare DavisForward364-121-32-255000011
Niels LaneGuard345-111-30-123100011
Cavan ReillyG264-103-80-021100011
Gerald Drumgoole Jr.Guard283-112-71-311200009
Jalun TrentGuard312-71-31-21700006
Tyler HouserF121-21-20-03110003
Wes Peterson Jr.G20-00-00-00000000
Hofstra
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Tyler ThomasNot Available388-264-152-364130022
Darlinstone DubarGuard407-132-62-391410018
Jacco FritzForward256-60-03-392110015
Jaquan CarlosGuard404-121-50-031000009
Bryce WashingtonGuard303-41-20-04101007
German PlotnikovG101-21-22-22100005
KiJan RobinsonG120-10-10-00000000
Silas SundayF50-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

70.5Possessions70.5
100.7Offensive Efficiency107.8
107.8Defensive Efficiency100.7
-7.1Net Efficiency7.1
50.0%Effective FG%52.3%
51.0%True Shooting %54.9%
18.4%Turnover Rate12.8%
22.2%Free Throw Rate17.2%
47.6%3-Point Rate48.4%
1.46Assist / Turnover2.11
Game Summary
Hofstra won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 70.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.