UTSA

5-25

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

10.6%UTSA

89.4%Rice

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADRice -15.2

PROJECTED TOTAL151.3

MODEL MONEYLINERice -843

Rice

13-18

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUTSA 68

Projected Total151.3

Projected ScoreRice 83

Team Comparison

UTSAMetricRice

30.5MMH Power Index45.1

99.0Offensive Efficiency108.3

115.0Defensive Efficiency109.2

-16.0Net Efficiency-0.9

-1.2Strength of Schedule-2.2

-17.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.3

70.2Tempo68.3

45.9%Effective FG%49.7%

17.0%Turnover Rate17.8%

30.9%Offensive Rebound %35.7%

29.9%Free Throw Rate34.7%

-11.3Average Margin-0.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Rice HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY89.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMRice holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (45.1–30.5), offensive efficiency (108.3–99.0), defensive efficiency (109.2–115.0), net efficiency (-0.9–-16.0).

UTSA COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.2–-2.2), ball security (17.0–17.8).

Final

UTSA

89—82

Rice

UTSA by 7 • 77.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UTSATEAM STATRice

30-63FG30-68

48.0%FG%44.0%

14-313PT8-30

45.0%3PT%27.0%

15-18FT14-18

83.0%FT%78.0%

39Rebounds33

12Offensive Rebounds11

18Assists16

17Turnovers12

10Steals7

1Blocks1

15Fouls14

Player Box Score

UTSA

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Carlton Linguard Jr.	Center	37	8-13	4-8	4-4	4	0	0	1	24
Dre Fuller Jr.	Guard	35	8-17	5-9	2-2	4	1	3	0	23
Jordan Ivy-Curry	Guard	30	3-9	1-3	8-9	7	4	3	0	15
Christian Tucker	Guard	40	4-6	2-3	0-0	5	7	2	0	10
PJ Carter	G	18	2-5	2-5	0-0	4	2	0	0	6
Trey Edmonds	Center	20	2-4	0-0	1-3	4	1	0	0	5
Massal Diouf	Forward	22	2-4	0-0	0-0	5	0	1	0	4
Isaiah Wyatt	Guard	23	1-5	0-3	0-0	4	3	1	0	2

Rice

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Travis Evee	Guard	41	10-22	2-9	3-4	5	2	1	0	25
Mekhi Mason	G	41	9-16	2-3	2-4	5	1	3	1	22
Noah Shelby	G	22	5-9	2-6	0-0	1	0	1	0	12
Keanu Dawes	F	35	1-6	0-4	7-8	2	1	0	0	9
Max Fiedler	Forward	43	3-5	0-1	0-0	12	8	1	0	6
Alem Huseinovic	Guard	24	2-6	2-5	0-0	1	2	0	0	6
Anthony Selden	Guard	7	0-1	0-1	2-2	0	1	0	0	2
Gabe Warren	G	10	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	1	1	0	0
Andrew Akuchie	F	2	0-2	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

77.1Possessions77.1

115.4Offensive Efficiency106.4

106.4Defensive Efficiency115.4

9.1Net Efficiency-9.1

58.7%Effective FG%50.0%

62.2%True Shooting %53.6%

22.2%Turnover Rate15.5%

28.6%Free Throw Rate26.5%

49.2%3-Point Rate44.1%

1.06Assist / Turnover1.33

Game Summary

UTSA won by 7 points. The game played at approximately 77.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.