Alabama

24-10

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

39.1%Alabama

60.9%Vanderbilt

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADVanderbilt -4.7

PROJECTED TOTAL173.5

MODEL MONEYLINEVanderbilt -156

Vanderbilt

27-9

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreAlabama 84

Projected Total173.5

Projected ScoreVanderbilt 89

Team Comparison

AlabamaMetricVanderbilt

69.5MMH Power Index68.9

121.6Offensive Efficiency120.9

111.2Defensive Efficiency105.7

10.4Net Efficiency15.2

9.4Strength of Schedule7.4

9.5Last 10 Net Efficiency2.7

74.7Tempo70.9

54.9%Effective FG%55.3%

13.0%Turnover Rate13.5%

32.1%Offensive Rebound %30.8%

36.9%Free Throw Rate39.3%

7.7Average Margin10.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Alabama HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY60.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–5

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMAlabama holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (69.5–68.9), offensive efficiency (121.6–120.9), strength of schedule (9.4–7.4), recent form (9.5–2.7).

Vanderbilt COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (105.7–111.2), net efficiency (15.2–10.4), shooting efficiency (55.3–54.9).

Final

Alabama

78—75

Vanderbilt

Alabama by 3 • 71.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

AlabamaTEAM STATVanderbilt

26-53FG26-65

49.0%FG%40.0%

12-303PT7-26

40.0%3PT%27.0%

14-21FT16-20

67.0%FT%80.0%

41Rebounds34

9Offensive Rebounds11

13Assists6

16Turnovers9

5Steals10

5Blocks3

15Fouls17

Player Box Score

Alabama

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Mark Sears	Guard	34	6-13	3-5	6-6	4	3	3	0	21
Rylan Griffen	G	30	7-11	1-4	1-3	4	1	1	0	16
Latrell Wrightsell	G	25	3-8	3-7	2-2	1	1	0	0	11
Grant Nelson	Forward	28	3-5	1-3	2-5	5	1	0	3	9
Sam Walters	F	13	2-4	2-4	2-2	2	0	0	0	8
Aaron Estrada	Guard	28	2-7	1-5	0-0	7	6	0	1	5
Jarin Stevenson	F	15	2-3	1-2	0-1	4	0	0	0	5
Nick Pringle	F	16	1-2	0-0	0-0	4	0	1	1	2
Mo Dioubate	F	4	0-0	0-0	1-2	1	0	0	0	1
Mohamed Wague	F	7	0-0	0-0	0-0	3	1	0	0	0

Vanderbilt

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tyrin Lawrence	Guard	35	7-19	2-6	4-6	5	1	3	0	20
Jason Rivera-Torres	G	23	8-13	1-4	3-4	6	1	2	1	20
Ezra Manjon	Guard	27	5-11	0-2	6-6	1	0	2	0	16
Tasos Kamateros	Forward	31	2-7	2-7	0-0	5	0	1	0	6
Jordan Williams	G	22	2-5	2-4	0-0	0	2	1	1	6
Ven-Allen Lubin	F	15	1-2	0-0	2-2	4	2	0	1	4
Evan Taylor	Guard	22	1-7	0-3	0-0	6	0	1	0	2
Malik Presley	G	8	0-0	0-0	1-2	0	0	0	0	1
Paul Lewis	G	9	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Carter Lang	F	8	0-0	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

71.3Possessions71.3

109.4Offensive Efficiency105.2

105.2Defensive Efficiency109.4

4.2Net Efficiency-4.2

60.4%Effective FG%45.4%

61.9%True Shooting %50.3%

22.9%Turnover Rate12.4%

39.6%Free Throw Rate30.8%

56.6%3-Point Rate40.0%

0.81Assist / Turnover0.67

Game Summary

Alabama won by 3 points. The game played at approximately 71.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Effective FG%, True Shooting %, Turnover Rate.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.