Lipscomb

18-13

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

45.6%Lipscomb

54.4%Bellarmine

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADBellarmine -0.6

PROJECTED TOTAL159.8

MODEL MONEYLINEBellarmine -119

Bellarmine

13-19

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreLipscomb 80

Projected Total159.8

Projected ScoreBellarmine 80

Team Comparison

LipscombMetricBellarmine

47.9MMH Power Index44.9

111.3Offensive Efficiency119.6

107.6Defensive Efficiency122.1

3.7Net Efficiency-2.5

-2.5Strength of Schedule-2.8

-1.0Last 10 Net Efficiency0.3

68.8Tempo66.9

54.8%Effective FG%60.0%

16.0%Turnover Rate15.3%

25.9%Offensive Rebound %22.7%

26.5%Free Throw Rate35.3%

2.5Average Margin-1.7

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Lipscomb HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY54.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–5

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLipscomb holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (47.9–44.9), defensive efficiency (107.6–122.1), net efficiency (3.7–-2.5), strength of schedule (-2.5–-2.8).

Bellarmine COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (119.6–111.3), recent form (0.3–-1.0), shooting efficiency (60.0–54.8).

Final

Lipscomb

81—70

Bellarmine

Lipscomb by 11 • 63.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

LipscombTEAM STATBellarmine

28-59FG27-58

47.0%FG%47.0%

14-333PT11-26

42.0%3PT%42.0%

11-13FT5-6

85.0%FT%83.0%

36Rebounds27

10Offensive Rebounds6

19Assists12

8Turnovers8

6Steals1

1Blocks1

9Fouls14

Player Box Score

Lipscomb

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Joe Anderson	Guard	33	7-12	5-7	0-0	3	7	3	1	19
AJ McGinnis	Guard	29	4-9	4-8	2-2	1	0	1	0	14
Derrin Boyd	Guard	24	5-11	1-5	3-3	4	1	0	0	14
Will Pruitt	Guard	35	3-6	2-4	0-0	10	3	0	0	8
Owen McCormack	Center	29	3-9	1-5	1-1	7	3	1	0	8
Rylan Houck	Forward	14	2-3	1-1	2-4	2	0	0	0	7
Cody Head	G	16	2-5	0-2	1-1	3	2	1	0	5
Grant Asman	F	12	2-4	0-1	0-0	3	1	0	0	4
Dylan Faulkner	F	8	0-0	0-0	2-2	1	2	0	0	2

Bellarmine

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Ben Johnson	G	32	6-11	4-6	0-0	5	3	0	0	16
Garrett Tipton	Guard	34	5-8	3-6	0-0	2	1	0	0	13
Langdon Hatton	Center	25	5-10	0-0	2-2	6	0	0	0	12
Peter Suder	G	34	4-11	0-2	2-3	5	3	0	0	10
Billy Smith	G	27	4-8	2-4	0-0	1	1	1	0	10
Alec Pfriem	Guard	32	3-6	2-5	1-1	4	3	0	1	9
Landin Hacker	Guard	16	0-4	0-3	0-0	1	1	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

63.1Possessions63.1

128.4Offensive Efficiency110.9

110.9Defensive Efficiency128.4

17.4Net Efficiency-17.4

59.3%Effective FG%56.0%

62.1%True Shooting %57.5%

12.7%Turnover Rate12.7%

22.0%Free Throw Rate10.3%

55.9%3-Point Rate44.8%

2.38Assist / Turnover1.50

Game Summary

Lipscomb won by 11 points. The game played at approximately 63.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.