Prairie View A&M

19-18

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

38.1%Prairie View A&M

61.9%Grambling

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADGrambling -4.1

PROJECTED TOTAL148.9

MODEL MONEYLINEGrambling -162

Grambling

14-19

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScorePrairie View A&M 72

Projected Total148.9

Projected ScoreGrambling 77

Team Comparison

Prairie View A&MMetricGrambling

41.6MMH Power Index41.4

105.6Offensive Efficiency100.7

103.9Defensive Efficiency100.4

1.7Net Efficiency0.3

-9.8Strength of Schedule-5.7

4.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.4

73.8Tempo69.9

49.2%Effective FG%49.2%

15.9%Turnover Rate20.9%

27.7%Offensive Rebound %30.4%

42.9%Free Throw Rate42.2%

1.3Average Margin0.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Prairie View A&M HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY61.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPrairie View A&M holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (41.6–41.4), offensive efficiency (105.6–100.7), net efficiency (1.7–0.3), recent form (4.4–-0.4).

Grambling COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (100.4–103.9), strength of schedule (-5.7–-9.8), offensive rebounding (30.4–27.7).

Final

Prairie View A&M

63—69

Grambling

Grambling by 6 • 65.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Prairie View A&MTEAM STATGrambling

24-54FG26-48

44.0%FG%54.0%

3-83PT3-6

38.0%3PT%50.0%

12-19FT14-20

63.0%FT%70.0%

23Rebounds36

11Offensive Rebounds13

17Assists12

13Turnovers22

10Steals6

2Blocks4

19Fouls22

Player Box Score

Prairie View A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Charles Smith IV	Guard	29	9-16	2-4	4-5	1	1	1	0	24
Javontae Hopkins	Guard	36	6-10	0-0	3-6	2	4	4	0	15
Kevin McGaskey	Guard	35	1-3	0-0	4-6	2	6	2	0	6
Charles Lane Jr.	Guard	13	3-6	0-1	0-0	4	0	0	0	6
Brian Myles	Forward	25	2-6	0-0	0-0	4	1	0	1	4
Nick Gazelas	Guard	27	1-3	1-2	0-0	3	3	1	0	3
McKinley Harris	Forward	12	1-2	0-0	1-2	2	1	1	0	3
Chris Felix Jr.	Forward	14	1-7	0-1	0-0	4	0	0	1	2
Andre Nunley	G	6	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	1	1	0	0
Justin Nimmer	Guard	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Grambling

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jourdan Smith	Guard	29	4-14	1-2	4-5	5	0	1	2	13
Mikale Stevenson	G	32	4-9	0-1	3-4	2	6	2	0	11
Antwan Burnett	G	34	3-4	1-1	3-3	8	1	0	1	10
Kintavious Dozier	G	15	3-5	1-2	1-2	2	0	0	0	8
Jonathan Aku	Forward	15	2-2	0-0	0-0	3	1	0	0	4
Tra'Michael Moton	Guard	27	1-2	0-0	1-2	0	4	1	1	3
Terrence Lewis	Guard	22	0-1	0-0	0-0	4	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

65.8Possessions65.8

95.7Offensive Efficiency104.9

104.9Defensive Efficiency95.7

-9.1Net Efficiency9.1

47.2%Effective FG%57.3%

50.0%True Shooting %60.0%

20.0%Turnover Rate33.1%

35.2%Free Throw Rate41.7%

14.8%3-Point Rate12.5%

1.31Assist / Turnover0.55

Game Summary

Grambling won by 6 points. The game played at approximately 65.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Turnover Rate, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.