
UT Rio Grande Valley
19-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
72.8%UT Rio Grande Valley
27.2%Abilene Christian
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUT Rio Grande Valley -5.5
PROJECTED TOTAL144.7
MODEL MONEYLINEUT Rio Grande Valley -268

Abilene Christian
14-19MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 75
Projected Total144.7
Projected ScoreAbilene Christian 70
Team Comparison
55.8MMH Power Index42.4
112.6Offensive Efficiency101.1
103.1Defensive Efficiency104.1
9.5Net Efficiency-3.0
-1.9Strength of Schedule-1.4
12.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.3
67.4Tempo69.6
55.7%Effective FG%48.9%
17.9%Turnover Rate20.6%
29.2%Offensive Rebound %32.4%
29.6%Free Throw Rate42.0%
6.4Average Margin-2.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UT Rio Grande Valley HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY72.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Rio Grande Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.8–42.4), offensive efficiency (112.6–101.1), defensive efficiency (103.1–104.1), net efficiency (9.5–-3.0).
Abilene Christian COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.4–-1.9), offensive rebounding (32.4–29.2), free throw rate (42.0–29.6).