Chicago State

7-25

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

19.3%Chicago State

80.7%UTEP

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUTEP -10.8

PROJECTED TOTAL141.8

MODEL MONEYLINEUTEP -418

UTEP

11-20

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreChicago State 65

Projected Total141.8

Projected ScoreUTEP 76

Team Comparison

Chicago StateMetricUTEP

36.1MMH Power Index44.4

99.4Offensive Efficiency102.6

114.9Defensive Efficiency107.1

-15.5Net Efficiency-4.5

0.5Strength of Schedule1.7

-4.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7

66.2Tempo67.6

45.6%Effective FG%49.2%

15.8%Turnover Rate17.3%

29.1%Offensive Rebound %27.6%

30.7%Free Throw Rate35.6%

-10.3Average Margin-3.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UTEP HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY80.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUTEP holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (44.4–36.1), offensive efficiency (102.6–99.4), defensive efficiency (107.1–114.9), net efficiency (-4.5–-15.5).

Chicago State COUNTERS WITHrecent form (-4.3–-4.7), ball security (15.8–17.3), offensive rebounding (29.1–27.6).

Final

Chicago State

69—74

UTEP

UTEP by 5 • 71.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Chicago StateTEAM STATUTEP

25-45FG26-50

56.0%FG%52.0%

5-113PT7-12

45.0%3PT%58.0%

14-18FT15-23

78.0%FT%65.0%

29Rebounds21

9Offensive Rebounds8

10Assists12

27Turnovers18

8Steals15

7Blocks2

19Fouls14

Player Box Score

Chicago State

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jahsean Corbett	Guard	37	10-15	0-1	3-3	10	1	0	0	23
Noble Crawford	Forward	34	8-14	2-4	0-0	6	2	2	4	18
Brent Davis	Guard	32	1-5	1-3	5-5	1	0	4	0	8
Wesley Cardet Jr.	Guard	21	2-3	2-2	1-4	2	2	0	0	7
Deshawn Jean-Charles	G	29	1-2	0-0	3-4	5	0	0	1	5
Tristan Arneaud	Guard	7	1-2	0-1	2-2	1	2	0	0	4
A.J. Neal Jr.	G	24	1-3	0-0	0-0	1	2	2	0	2
Cameron Jernigan	Forward	14	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	2	2
Greg Spate	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

UTEP

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tae Hardy	Guard	31	4-9	3-3	2-2	1	2	2	0	13
Corey Camper Jr.	G	29	4-6	0-1	3-6	4	1	2	0	11
Trey Horton III	G	19	4-6	3-5	0-0	0	0	1	0	11
Zid Powell	Guard	25	2-6	1-2	5-6	3	3	3	1	10
David Terrell Jr.	G	31	3-5	0-0	2-4	2	3	3	0	8
Kevin Kalu	Forward	20	4-6	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	1	8
Otis Frazier III	Forward	19	3-7	0-1	2-3	1	2	3	0	8
Elijah Jones	F	6	1-1	0-0	1-2	1	0	0	0	3
Calvin Solomon	Forward	14	1-3	0-0	0-0	5	0	1	0	2
Baylor Hebb	Guard	6	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

71.3Possessions71.3

96.8Offensive Efficiency103.8

103.8Defensive Efficiency96.8

-7.0Net Efficiency7.0

61.1%Effective FG%59.0%

64.4%True Shooting %60.7%

37.7%Turnover Rate25.4%

40.0%Free Throw Rate46.0%

24.4%3-Point Rate24.0%

0.37Assist / Turnover0.67

Game Summary

UTEP won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 71.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Turnover Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.