
Seattle U
21-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
26.9%Seattle U
73.1%UT Rio Grande Valley
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUT Rio Grande Valley -6.7
PROJECTED TOTAL142.6
MODEL MONEYLINEUT Rio Grande Valley -272

UT Rio Grande Valley
19-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreSeattle U 68
Projected Total142.6
Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 75
Team Comparison
51.4MMH Power Index55.8
103.9Offensive Efficiency112.6
96.9Defensive Efficiency103.1
7.0Net Efficiency9.5
-1.7Strength of Schedule-1.9
4.1Last 10 Net Efficiency12.3
69.4Tempo67.4
50.8%Effective FG%55.7%
16.6%Turnover Rate17.9%
25.1%Offensive Rebound %29.2%
35.2%Free Throw Rate29.6%
4.9Average Margin6.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UT Rio Grande Valley HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY73.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Rio Grande Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.8–51.4), offensive efficiency (112.6–103.9), net efficiency (9.5–7.0), recent form (12.3–4.1).
Seattle U COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (96.9–103.1), strength of schedule (-1.7–-1.9), ball security (16.6–17.9).