Utah Valley

25-9

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

63.4%Utah Valley

36.6%UT Arlington

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUtah Valley -3.3

PROJECTED TOTAL142.8

MODEL MONEYLINEUtah Valley -173

UT Arlington

18-14

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUtah Valley 73

Projected Total142.8

Projected ScoreUT Arlington 70

Team Comparison

Utah ValleyMetricUT Arlington

59.1MMH Power Index49.6

113.4Offensive Efficiency102.7

97.3Defensive Efficiency97.9

16.1Net Efficiency4.8

-3.3Strength of Schedule-0.8

6.8Last 10 Net Efficiency-3.9

70.6Tempo68.1

56.0%Effective FG%48.5%

19.9%Turnover Rate20.4%

36.2%Offensive Rebound %36.0%

37.3%Free Throw Rate43.7%

11.4Average Margin3.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Utah Valley HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY63.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUtah Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.1–49.6), offensive efficiency (113.4–102.7), defensive efficiency (97.3–97.9), net efficiency (16.1–4.8).

UT Arlington COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-0.8–-3.3), free throw rate (43.7–37.3).

Final

Utah Valley

69—83

UT Arlington

UT Arlington by 14 • 75.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Utah ValleyTEAM STATUT Arlington

17-55FG26-53

31.0%FG%49.0%

6-203PT11-29

30.0%3PT%38.0%

29-39FT20-29

74.0%FT%69.0%

35Rebounds38

8Offensive Rebounds6

13Assists20

11Turnovers14

6Steals8

1Blocks5

21Fouls28

Player Box Score

Utah Valley

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Drake Allen	G	29	4-11	2-5	6-8	3	2	1	0	16
Trevin Dorius	Center	28	4-8	0-0	6-8	10	0	1	0	14
Caleb Stone-Carrawell	Forward	32	3-13	2-4	3-4	4	3	1	0	11
Jaden McClanahan	Guard	22	3-7	1-2	3-5	1	2	0	0	10
Osiris Grady	F	22	2-4	0-0	4-4	4	0	0	0	8
Tanner Toolson	G	19	0-4	0-2	4-6	3	2	0	0	4
K'mani Doughty	Guard	17	1-5	1-4	1-2	0	1	0	1	4
Trevan Leonhardt	G	13	0-3	0-3	2-2	2	1	2	0	2
Nate Tshimanga	Forward	12	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	2	1	0	0
Ethan Potter	F	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

UT Arlington

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
DaJuan Gordon	Guard	33	6-8	1-2	9-10	6	1	3	1	22
Makaih Williams	G	26	5-8	2-3	1-2	3	8	2	0	13
Akili Vining	Guard	25	4-8	3-6	2-2	1	5	1	0	13
Shemar Wilson	Forward	36	3-6	1-3	4-6	12	2	1	3	11
Brandyn Talbot	Guard	24	3-6	3-6	0-1	5	3	0	1	9
Dwayne Koroma	F	15	2-4	1-1	2-4	1	0	0	0	7
Aaron Cash	Guard	20	2-6	0-4	0-0	1	0	0	0	4
Sterling Gaston-Chapman	Guard	8	1-2	0-0	1-2	2	0	1	0	3
Kade Douglas	G	13	0-5	0-4	1-2	1	1	0	0	1

Advanced Game Stats

75.7Possessions75.7

91.1Offensive Efficiency109.6

109.6Defensive Efficiency91.1

-18.5Net Efficiency18.5

36.4%Effective FG%59.4%

46.9%True Shooting %62.1%

14.4%Turnover Rate18.7%

70.9%Free Throw Rate54.7%

36.4%3-Point Rate54.7%

1.18Assist / Turnover1.43

Game Summary

UT Arlington won by 14 points. The game played at approximately 75.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Effective FG%, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.