Kent State logo

Kent State

24-10
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
66.4%Kent State
33.6%Central Michigan
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADKent State -4.4
PROJECTED TOTAL160.8
MODEL MONEYLINEKent State -198
Central Michigan logo

Central Michigan

10-21
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreKent State 83
Projected Total160.8
Projected ScoreCentral Michigan 78

Team Comparison

54.7MMH Power Index44
113.9Offensive Efficiency105.9
107.6Defensive Efficiency111.0
6.3Net Efficiency-5.1
-0.1Strength of Schedule-0.5
2.1Last 10 Net Efficiency1.3
74.0Tempo69.3
53.0%Effective FG%52.6%
17.7%Turnover Rate18.3%
35.0%Offensive Rebound %29.6%
43.5%Free Throw Rate32.9%
4.7Average Margin-3.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Kent State HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY66.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
11–0
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMKent State holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.7–44.0), offensive efficiency (113.9–105.9), defensive efficiency (107.6–111.0), net efficiency (6.3–-5.1).
Final
Kent State logo
Kent State
62—77
Central Michigan logo
Central Michigan
Central Michigan by 15 • 60.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Kent StateTEAM STATCentral Michigan
21-66FG30-53
32.0%FG%57.0%
11-283PT9-23
39.0%3PT%39.0%
9-14FT8-10
64.0%FT%80.0%
33Rebounds39
15Offensive Rebounds7
12Assists18
5Turnovers8
2Steals4
1Blocks4
14Fouls11

Player Box Score

Kent State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
VonCameron DavisForward337-173-63-652210020
Jalen SullingerGuard396-133-72-245000017
Chris Payton Jr.Forward363-130-02-47100008
Reggie BassGuard232-62-62-23100008
Giovanni SantiagoGuard272-72-40-02200006
Mike BekeljaGuard291-61-50-03100003
Donovan HunterF60-10-00-01000000
Tyem FreemanGuard30-30-00-02000000
Magnus EntenmannF20-00-00-00000000
LA HayesG10-00-00-00000000
Jake SnyderGuard10-00-00-00000000
Central Michigan
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Derrick ButlerGuard317-124-51-240000019
Brian TaylorGuard387-110-23-386120017
Anthony PritchardGuard364-81-32-256100011
Markus HardingC274-70-32-390010010
Paul McMillan IVG133-41-20-00210007
Aidan RubioG152-32-30-02101006
Jemal DavisForward152-40-10-04210004
Cayden VaskoG251-41-40-02100003

Advanced Game Stats

60.8Possessions60.8
102.0Offensive Efficiency126.6
126.6Defensive Efficiency102.0
-24.7Net Efficiency24.7
40.2%Effective FG%65.1%
42.7%True Shooting %66.7%
8.0%Turnover Rate13.6%
21.2%Free Throw Rate18.9%
42.4%3-Point Rate43.4%
2.40Assist / Turnover2.25
Game Summary
Central Michigan won by 15 points. The game played at approximately 60.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Effective FG%, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.