Austin Peay

22-9

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

56.5%Austin Peay

43.5%Lipscomb

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADAustin Peay -1.2

PROJECTED TOTAL155.4

MODEL MONEYLINEAustin Peay -130

Lipscomb

18-13

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreAustin Peay 78

Projected Total155.4

Projected ScoreLipscomb 77

Team Comparison

Austin PeayMetricLipscomb

54.8MMH Power Index47.9

115.0Offensive Efficiency111.3

103.1Defensive Efficiency107.6

11.9Net Efficiency3.7

-5.8Strength of Schedule-2.5

8.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.0

71.0Tempo68.8

53.9%Effective FG%54.8%

15.3%Turnover Rate16.0%

30.3%Offensive Rebound %25.9%

39.0%Free Throw Rate26.5%

8.4Average Margin2.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Austin Peay HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY56.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMAustin Peay holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.8–47.9), offensive efficiency (115.0–111.3), defensive efficiency (103.1–107.6), net efficiency (11.9–3.7).

Lipscomb COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-2.5–-5.8), shooting efficiency (54.8–53.9).

Final

Austin Peay

77—91

Lipscomb

Lipscomb by 14 • 70.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Austin PeayTEAM STATLipscomb

31-68FG36-58

46.0%FG%62.0%

5-193PT9-19

26.0%3PT%47.0%

10-16FT10-15

63.0%FT%67.0%

31Rebounds32

11Offensive Rebounds4

13Assists20

7Turnovers9

3Steals5

3Blocks10

14Fouls11

Player Box Score

Austin Peay

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
DeMarcus Sharp	Guard	39	11-18	0-0	1-2	8	4	0	0	23
JaVar Daniel	F	26	5-12	0-1	5-9	5	4	1	1	15
Ja'Monta Black	Guard	39	4-16	3-12	2-2	6	0	1	0	13
Dez White	G	28	4-7	2-5	0-0	2	3	0	1	10
Isaac Haney	Guard	22	2-5	0-1	1-1	0	0	0	0	5
Sai Witt	Forward	10	2-3	0-0	1-2	3	0	0	0	5
Hansel Enmanuel	PG	16	1-2	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	1	2
Dezi Jones	Guard	11	1-2	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	2
Daniel Loos	Forward	6	1-3	0-0	0-0	3	1	1	0	2
Jonathan Dunn	F	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Jordan Wilmore	Center	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Lipscomb

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Derrin Boyd	Guard	34	10-15	2-3	2-5	2	3	2	0	24
Dylan Faulkner	F	19	7-8	0-0	1-2	7	0	0	5	15
AJ McGinnis	Guard	31	5-8	3-5	1-2	3	1	0	0	14
Will Pruitt	Guard	30	2-5	1-2	6-6	8	6	1	0	11
Joe Anderson	Guard	37	4-8	1-2	0-0	2	6	2	1	9
Cody Head	G	18	4-6	1-2	0-0	3	1	0	0	9
Owen McCormack	Center	22	3-5	1-3	0-0	3	1	0	2	7
Grant Asman	F	7	1-3	0-2	0-0	1	2	0	2	2
Rylan Houck	Forward	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

70.9Possessions70.9

108.6Offensive Efficiency128.3

128.3Defensive Efficiency108.6

-19.7Net Efficiency19.7

49.3%Effective FG%69.8%

50.9%True Shooting %69.9%

9.8%Turnover Rate12.8%

23.5%Free Throw Rate25.9%

27.9%3-Point Rate32.8%

1.86Assist / Turnover2.22

Game Summary

Lipscomb won by 14 points. The game played at approximately 70.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Effective FG%, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.