Ball State logo

Ball State

12-19
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
7.9%Ball State
92.1%Toledo
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADToledo -15.6
PROJECTED TOTAL148.4
MODEL MONEYLINEToledo -1166
Toledo logo

Toledo

19-15
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBall State 66
Projected Total148.4
Projected ScoreToledo 82

Team Comparison

41.3MMH Power Index58.8
101.7Offensive Efficiency116.0
104.7Defensive Efficiency109.6
-3.0Net Efficiency6.4
-3.9Strength of Schedule2.3
-0.9Last 10 Net Efficiency10.2
66.4Tempo69.8
48.3%Effective FG%55.1%
16.0%Turnover Rate14.6%
26.5%Offensive Rebound %30.4%
33.0%Free Throw Rate30.3%
-2.0Average Margin4.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Toledo HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY92.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMToledo holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.8–41.3), offensive efficiency (116.0–101.7), net efficiency (6.4–-3.0), strength of schedule (2.3–-3.9).
Ball State COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (104.7–109.6), free throw rate (33.0–30.3).
Final
Ball State logo
Ball State
72—77
Toledo logo
Toledo
Toledo by 5 • 61.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Ball StateTEAM STATToledo
27-53FG27-61
51.0%FG%44.0%
8-253PT7-18
32.0%3PT%39.0%
10-11FT16-22
91.0%FT%73.0%
29Rebounds34
7Offensive Rebounds15
10Assists12
10Turnovers5
3Steals7
6Blocks—
18Fouls13

Player Box Score

Ball State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jalin AndersonPoint Guard3810-152-53-365300025
Basheer JihadForward375-112-31-251050013
Davion BaileyG365-143-110-020000013
Mickey Pearson Jr.Forward382-60-34-47200008
Ben HendriksCenter193-30-02-22001008
Trent Middleton Jr.G71-11-10-00100003
Mason JonesF251-30-20-03100002
Toledo
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Ra'Heim MossGuard339-153-53-521100024
Dante Maddox Jr.Guard367-173-74-475200021
Javan SimmonsF284-80-04-440000012
Tyler CochranG333-91-22-46000009
Sonny WilsonG353-70-01-26320007
Sam LewisG121-10-02-31300004
Andre LorentssonForward120-40-40-00010000
Ben WightForward110-00-00-02010000

Advanced Game Stats

61.4Possessions61.4
117.3Offensive Efficiency125.4
125.4Defensive Efficiency117.3
-8.1Net Efficiency8.1
58.5%Effective FG%50.0%
61.8%True Shooting %53.9%
16.3%Turnover Rate8.1%
20.8%Free Throw Rate36.1%
47.2%3-Point Rate29.5%
1.00Assist / Turnover2.40
Game Summary
Toledo won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 61.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.