Utah Valley

25-9

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

46.5%Utah Valley

53.5%UT Rio Grande Valley

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUT Rio Grande Valley -0.6

PROJECTED TOTAL148.4

MODEL MONEYLINEUT Rio Grande Valley -115

UT Rio Grande Valley

19-14

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUtah Valley 74

Projected Total148.4

Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 74

Team Comparison

Utah ValleyMetricUT Rio Grande Valley

59.1MMH Power Index55.8

113.4Offensive Efficiency112.6

97.3Defensive Efficiency103.1

16.1Net Efficiency9.5

-3.3Strength of Schedule-1.9

6.8Last 10 Net Efficiency12.3

70.6Tempo67.4

56.0%Effective FG%55.7%

19.9%Turnover Rate17.9%

36.2%Offensive Rebound %29.2%

37.3%Free Throw Rate29.6%

11.4Average Margin6.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Utah Valley HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY53.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUtah Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.1–55.8), offensive efficiency (113.4–112.6), defensive efficiency (97.3–103.1), net efficiency (16.1–9.5).

UT Rio Grande Valley COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.9–-3.3), recent form (12.3–6.8), ball security (17.9–19.9).

Final

Utah Valley

68—76

UT Rio Grande Valley

UT Rio Grande Valley by 8 • 73.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Utah ValleyTEAM STATUT Rio Grande Valley

22-67FG24-48

33.0%FG%50.0%

5-293PT6-16

17.0%3PT%38.0%

19-24FT22-32

79.0%FT%69.0%

42Rebounds35

19Offensive Rebounds7

11Assists15

14Turnovers17

10Steals9

4Blocks5

20Fouls17

Player Box Score

Utah Valley

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Trevin Dorius	Center	35	6-8	0-0	2-4	8	0	1	1	14
Jaden McClanahan	Guard	26	2-8	2-6	6-6	3	2	2	0	12
Drake Allen	G	30	4-11	0-4	3-4	3	1	1	2	11
Caleb Stone-Carrawell	Forward	28	3-14	0-6	2-2	5	2	1	0	8
K'mani Doughty	Guard	15	2-8	1-5	2-2	0	3	2	1	7
Nate Tshimanga	Forward	24	2-4	0-0	2-4	7	2	0	0	6
Trevan Leonhardt	G	18	2-6	2-4	0-0	1	0	3	0	6
Osiris Grady	F	12	1-3	0-0	0-0	4	0	0	0	2
Tanner Toolson	G	12	0-5	0-4	2-2	4	1	0	0	2

UT Rio Grande Valley

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Daylen Williams	Forward	36	2-6	0-1	10-10	6	4	1	0	14
Elijah Elliott	G	36	4-8	1-4	5-9	4	5	0	0	14
J.J. Howard	Guard	31	6-8	2-3	0-0	2	0	2	3	14
Ahren Freeman	Forward	19	5-9	1-1	0-0	3	1	2	0	11
Hasan Abdul Hakim	G	36	3-10	1-4	3-7	4	3	2	1	10
Saliou Seye	F	20	2-2	0-0	2-4	0	0	2	0	6
CJ Booker	PG	6	1-1	1-1	2-2	0	1	0	1	5
Alex Horiuk	F	4	1-1	0-0	0-0	4	0	0	0	2
Sherman Brashear	Guard	12	0-3	0-2	0-0	3	1	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

73.3Possessions73.3

92.8Offensive Efficiency103.7

103.7Defensive Efficiency92.8

-10.9Net Efficiency10.9

36.6%Effective FG%56.3%

43.4%True Shooting %60.1%

19.1%Turnover Rate23.2%

35.8%Free Throw Rate66.7%

43.3%3-Point Rate33.3%

0.79Assist / Turnover0.88

Game Summary

UT Rio Grande Valley won by 8 points. The game played at approximately 73.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.