Utah logo

Utah

10-22
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
9.9%Utah
90.1%Stanford
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADStanford -14.6
PROJECTED TOTAL153.5
MODEL MONEYLINEStanford -910
Stanford logo

Stanford

20-13
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUtah 69
Projected Total153.5
Projected ScoreStanford 84

Team Comparison

43.9MMH Power Index59.2
108.8Offensive Efficiency111.6
115.8Defensive Efficiency107.1
-7.0Net Efficiency4.5
5.1Strength of Schedule5.2
-16.3Last 10 Net Efficiency7.4
68.3Tempo68.1
52.3%Effective FG%51.9%
16.7%Turnover Rate15.5%
28.8%Offensive Rebound %32.4%
32.2%Free Throw Rate37.2%
-4.8Average Margin3.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Stanford HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY90.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMStanford holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.2–43.9), offensive efficiency (111.6–108.8), defensive efficiency (107.1–115.8), net efficiency (4.5–-7.0).
Utah COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (52.3–51.9).
Final
Utah logo
Utah
73—79
Stanford logo
Stanford
Stanford by 6 • 68.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UtahTEAM STATStanford
28-63FG25-61
44.0%FG%41.0%
13-323PT10-26
41.0%3PT%38.0%
4-12FT19-26
33.0%FT%73.0%
35Rebounds40
7Offensive Rebounds9
17Assists17
6Turnovers5
4Steals4
2Blocks4
20Fouls14

Player Box Score

Utah
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Branden CarlsonCenter327-172-80-160110016
Deivon SmithGuard326-142-52-41011100016
Gabe MadsenGuard365-124-90-052100014
Keba KeitaF224-80-01-36011009
Ben CarlsonForward193-63-50-02000009
Cole BajemaGuard312-42-41-22300007
Lawson LoveringCenter41-10-00-01100002
Hunter EricksonG110-00-00-22000000
Jayden TeatG80-10-10-00000000
Luka TarlacG50-00-00-01000000
Stanford
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Maxime RaynaudForward347-122-44-6112030020
Brandon AngelForward355-93-53-473000016
Michael JonesGuard314-81-46-604200015
Kanaan CarlyleG203-121-55-812000012
Andrej StojakovicG243-82-31-28010009
Spencer JonesForward232-30-10-05111004
Benny GealerG261-81-40-02500003
James KeefeForward70-10-00-01000000

Advanced Game Stats

68.6Possessions68.6
106.4Offensive Efficiency115.2
115.2Defensive Efficiency106.4
-8.7Net Efficiency8.7
54.8%Effective FG%49.2%
53.1%True Shooting %53.9%
8.9%Turnover Rate7.2%
19.0%Free Throw Rate42.6%
50.8%3-Point Rate42.6%
2.83Assist / Turnover3.40
Game Summary
Stanford won by 6 points. The game played at approximately 68.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.