Grambling

14-19

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

42.9%Grambling

57.1%Florida A&M

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADFlorida A&M -1.5

PROJECTED TOTAL142.5

MODEL MONEYLINEFlorida A&M -133

Florida A&M

14-16

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreGrambling 71

Projected Total142.5

Projected ScoreFlorida A&M 72

Team Comparison

GramblingMetricFlorida A&M

41.4MMH Power Index39.4

100.7Offensive Efficiency98.7

100.4Defensive Efficiency105.6

0.3Net Efficiency-6.9

-5.7Strength of Schedule-3.2

-0.4Last 10 Net Efficiency4.5

69.9Tempo70.6

49.2%Effective FG%49.2%

20.9%Turnover Rate21.6%

30.4%Offensive Rebound %30.5%

42.2%Free Throw Rate38.0%

0.2Average Margin-4.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Grambling HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY57.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGrambling holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (41.4–39.4), offensive efficiency (100.7–98.7), defensive efficiency (100.4–105.6), net efficiency (0.3–-6.9).

Florida A&M COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-3.2–-5.7), recent form (4.5–-0.4), offensive rebounding (30.5–30.4).

Final

Grambling

65—52

Florida A&M

Grambling by 13 • 60.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

GramblingTEAM STATFlorida A&M

25-56FG19-49

45.0%FG%39.0%

8-223PT5-18

36.0%3PT%28.0%

7-13FT9-15

54.0%FT%60.0%

35Rebounds30

11Offensive Rebounds9

11Assists12

10Turnovers12

9Steals3

1Blocks1

12Fouls13

Player Box Score

Grambling

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Kintavious Dozier	G	34	9-15	3-6	2-3	0	1	2	0	23
Antwan Burnett	G	36	4-10	2-4	3-6	9	3	2	0	13
Jonathan Aku	Forward	30	3-3	0-0	0-0	10	1	2	1	6
Mikale Stevenson	G	27	1-5	1-4	0-0	2	4	1	0	3
Tra'Michael Moton	Guard	16	1-6	1-5	0-0	0	1	1	0	3
Malik Lamin	Center	10	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Jimel Cofer Jr.	G	2	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Jourdan Smith	Guard	10	0-3	0-1	0-0	2	0	1	0	0
Zahad Munford	Guard	7	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Florida A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jalen Speer	G	31	5-13	3-8	2-2	3	4	0	0	15
K'Jei Parker	G	31	4-7	2-4	0-0	2	4	1	0	10
Shannon Grant	Center	24	3-7	0-0	2-2	5	0	1	0	8
Jordan Chatman	G	29	3-4	0-1	0-2	6	0	0	0	6
Hantz Louis-Jeune	G	26	2-5	0-0	2-2	7	1	1	0	6
Morrell Schramm	Guard	15	1-5	0-2	2-3	2	1	0	0	4
Matthew Webster	F	10	1-3	0-1	0-2	3	1	0	0	2
Ja'Derryus Eatmon	Forward	16	0-2	0-0	1-2	0	0	0	1	1
Roderick Coffee III	F	18	0-3	0-2	0-0	0	1	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

60.2Possessions60.2

108.0Offensive Efficiency86.4

86.4Defensive Efficiency108.0

21.6Net Efficiency-21.6

51.8%Effective FG%43.9%

52.3%True Shooting %46.3%

16.3%Turnover Rate20.3%

23.2%Free Throw Rate30.6%

39.3%3-Point Rate36.7%

1.10Assist / Turnover1.00

Game Summary

Grambling won by 13 points. The game played at approximately 60.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.