UT Rio Grande Valley

19-14

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

54.5%UT Rio Grande Valley

45.5%UT Arlington

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUT Arlington -0.2

PROJECTED TOTAL140.8

MODEL MONEYLINEUT Rio Grande Valley -120

UT Arlington

18-14

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 70

Projected Total140.8

Projected ScoreUT Arlington 71

Team Comparison

UT Rio Grande ValleyMetricUT Arlington

55.8MMH Power Index49.6

112.6Offensive Efficiency102.7

103.1Defensive Efficiency97.9

9.5Net Efficiency4.8

-1.9Strength of Schedule-0.8

12.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-3.9

67.4Tempo68.1

55.7%Effective FG%48.5%

17.9%Turnover Rate20.4%

29.2%Offensive Rebound %36.0%

29.6%Free Throw Rate43.7%

6.4Average Margin3.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UT Rio Grande Valley HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY54.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Rio Grande Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.8–49.6), offensive efficiency (112.6–102.7), net efficiency (9.5–4.8), recent form (12.3–-3.9).

UT Arlington COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (97.9–103.1), strength of schedule (-0.8–-1.9), offensive rebounding (36.0–29.2).

Final

UT Rio Grande Valley

73—91

UT Arlington

UT Arlington by 18 • 77.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UT Rio Grande ValleyTEAM STATUT Arlington

27-63FG26-65

43.0%FG%40.0%

3-143PT15-36

21.0%3PT%42.0%

16-21FT24-25

76.0%FT%96.0%

41Rebounds37

16Offensive Rebounds14

13Assists19

19Turnovers15

10Steals9

4Blocks6

18Fouls17

Player Box Score

UT Rio Grande Valley

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Elijah Elliott	G	37	8-19	1-3	5-7	7	4	1	0	22
J.J. Howard	Guard	24	5-12	0-2	6-6	5	1	0	0	16
Daylen Williams	Forward	32	3-4	0-0	3-4	6	2	2	0	9
Hasan Abdul Hakim	G	17	3-5	1-2	0-2	2	2	3	1	7
Sherman Brashear	Guard	13	2-4	1-3	0-0	1	2	0	0	5
CJ Booker	PG	27	1-8	0-4	2-2	3	2	0	0	4
Ahren Freeman	Forward	13	2-7	0-0	0-0	5	0	1	0	4
Alex Horiuk	F	12	2-2	0-0	0-0	6	0	1	1	4
Isaiah Barganier	F	5	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	0	2
Saliou Seye	F	18	0-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	1	2	0
Fadi Mougharbel	Guard	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Roy Jones III	Guard	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

UT Arlington

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Phillip Russell	Guard	30	7-13	4-9	6-6	3	6	2	1	24
Makaih Williams	G	32	6-11	3-6	5-6	4	2	3	0	20
DaJuan Gordon	Guard	30	4-11	2-3	4-4	6	2	0	0	14
Shemar Wilson	Forward	35	2-5	0-0	7-7	10	4	3	4	11
Brandyn Talbot	Guard	18	3-10	3-8	2-2	3	1	0	0	11
Kade Douglas	G	15	2-7	2-7	0-0	1	2	0	0	6
Akili Vining	Guard	21	1-5	1-3	0-0	1	1	0	0	3
Dwayne Koroma	F	5	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	1	0	2
Sterling Gaston-Chapman	Guard	14	0-2	0-0	0-0	2	1	0	1	0

Advanced Game Stats

77.0Possessions77.0

94.8Offensive Efficiency118.2

118.2Defensive Efficiency94.8

-23.4Net Efficiency23.4

45.2%Effective FG%51.5%

50.0%True Shooting %59.2%

25.0%Turnover Rate19.3%

33.3%Free Throw Rate38.5%

22.2%3-Point Rate55.4%

0.68Assist / Turnover1.27

Game Summary

UT Arlington won by 18 points. The game played at approximately 77.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.