Idaho logo

Idaho

21-15
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
57.5%Idaho
42.5%Idaho State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADIdaho -1.8
PROJECTED TOTAL152.7
MODEL MONEYLINEIdaho -135
Idaho State logo

Idaho State

13-20
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreIdaho 77
Projected Total152.7
Projected ScoreIdaho State 75

Team Comparison

53.2MMH Power Index45.9
111.6Offensive Efficiency111.0
104.3Defensive Efficiency113.4
7.3Net Efficiency-2.4
-2.4Strength of Schedule0.2
4.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-9.6
69.7Tempo67.1
52.8%Effective FG%52.2%
15.1%Turnover Rate16.5%
29.5%Offensive Rebound %33.9%
34.6%Free Throw Rate39.1%
5.1Average Margin-1.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Idaho HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY57.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMIdaho holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.2–45.9), offensive efficiency (111.6–111.0), defensive efficiency (104.3–113.4), net efficiency (7.3–-2.4).
Idaho State COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.2–-2.4), offensive rebounding (33.9–29.5), free throw rate (39.1–34.6).
Final
Idaho logo
Idaho
59—59
Idaho State logo
Idaho State
Tied • 61.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

IdahoTEAM STATIdaho State
22-53FG22-53
42.0%FG%42.0%
5-183PT5-18
28.0%3PT%28.0%
10-12FT10-12
83.0%FT%83.0%
36Rebounds36
7Offensive Rebounds7
8Assists8
10Turnovers10
2Steals2
4Blocks4
22Fouls22

Player Box Score

Idaho
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Quinn DenkerG335-121-23-335200014
Tyler LinhardtF235-111-42-260010013
Julius MimsF325-61-11-350010012
D'Angelo MinnisGuard332-40-02-23300006
Tre BlassingameG352-41-30-06000005
Kyson RoseForward162-71-30-02001005
Terren FrankF111-40-12-23000004
EJ Neal Jr.G170-50-40-01001000
Idaho State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Quinn DenkerG335-121-23-335200014
Tyler LinhardtF235-111-42-260010013
Julius MimsF325-61-11-350010012
D'Angelo MinnisGuard332-40-02-23300006
Tre BlassingameG352-41-30-06000005
Kyson RoseForward162-71-30-02001005
Terren FrankF111-40-12-23000004
EJ Neal Jr.G170-50-40-01001000

Advanced Game Stats

61.7Possessions61.7
95.6Offensive Efficiency95.6
95.6Defensive Efficiency95.6
0.0Net Efficiency0.0
46.2%Effective FG%46.2%
50.3%True Shooting %50.3%
16.2%Turnover Rate16.2%
22.6%Free Throw Rate22.6%
34.0%3-Point Rate34.0%
0.80Assist / Turnover0.80
Game Summary
Neither team finished level. The game played at approximately 61.7 possessions.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.