Gonzaga

31-4

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

97.7%Gonzaga

2.3%Pepperdine

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADGonzaga -24.7

PROJECTED TOTAL153.4

MODEL MONEYLINEGonzaga -4248

Pepperdine

9-23

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreGonzaga 89

Projected Total153.4

Projected ScorePepperdine 64

Team Comparison

GonzagaMetricPepperdine

76.4MMH Power Index38.2

119.7Offensive Efficiency103.2

94.0Defensive Efficiency113.6

25.7Net Efficiency-10.4

3.0Strength of Schedule0.7

18.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.3

70.4Tempo70.0

55.7%Effective FG%48.7%

13.6%Turnover Rate18.3%

35.0%Offensive Rebound %31.1%

31.5%Free Throw Rate34.0%

18.1Average Margin-7.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Gonzaga HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY97.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGonzaga holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (76.4–38.2), offensive efficiency (119.7–103.2), defensive efficiency (94.0–113.6), net efficiency (25.7–-10.4).

Pepperdine COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (34.0–31.5).

Final

Gonzaga

86—61

Pepperdine

Gonzaga by 25 • 67.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

GonzagaTEAM STATPepperdine

36-64FG22-56

56.0%FG%39.0%

8-203PT6-18

40.0%3PT%33.0%

6-12FT11-14

50.0%FT%79.0%

42Rebounds26

10Offensive Rebounds4

19Assists10

7Turnovers9

4Steals6

2Blocks2

17Fouls14

Player Box Score

Gonzaga

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Graham Ike	F	29	11-17	0-0	2-4	7	3	1	0	24
Nolan Hickman	Guard	36	7-16	3-10	2-3	3	1	2	0	19
Anton Watson	Forward	29	7-10	1-1	1-2	8	2	1	1	16
Braden Huff	F	11	4-5	1-2	0-0	2	1	0	1	9
Dusty Stromer	G	21	2-6	2-4	0-0	3	0	0	0	6
Ryan Nembhard	Guard	37	2-3	1-1	0-0	5	8	0	0	5
Ben Gregg	Forward	30	2-5	0-2	1-3	10	4	0	0	5
Junseok Yeo	F	4	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	2
Joe Few	Guard	3	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Pepperdine

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jevon Porter	F	34	5-13	2-5	4-6	4	0	2	0	16
Houston Mallette	G	33	3-12	3-9	0-0	4	1	0	0	9
Boubacar Coulibaly	Forward	25	3-5	0-0	1-1	3	0	1	1	7
Nils Cooper	G	23	2-2	0-0	3-4	4	1	1	0	7
Michael Ajayi	F	32	3-9	0-0	0-0	3	2	1	1	6
Ethan Anderson	Guard	20	2-6	0-0	1-1	1	5	1	0	5
Malik Messina-Moore	G	17	2-3	1-2	0-0	3	1	0	0	5
Cord Stansberry	G	7	2-4	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	4
Jalen Pitre	F	7	0-2	0-1	2-2	1	0	0	0	2
Aladji Gassama	Center	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

67.2Possessions67.2

128.0Offensive Efficiency90.8

90.8Defensive Efficiency128.0

37.2Net Efficiency-37.2

62.5%Effective FG%44.6%

61.7%True Shooting %48.7%

10.5%Turnover Rate13.3%

18.8%Free Throw Rate25.0%

31.3%3-Point Rate32.1%

2.71Assist / Turnover1.11

Game Summary

Gonzaga won by 25 points. The game played at approximately 67.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.