Wagner logo

Wagner

14-17
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
15.3%Wagner
84.7%Merrimack
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMerrimack -10.9
PROJECTED TOTAL138.3
MODEL MONEYLINEMerrimack -554
Merrimack logo

Merrimack

23-11
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreWagner 64
Projected Total138.3
Projected ScoreMerrimack 75

Team Comparison

42.9MMH Power Index53.7
105.5Offensive Efficiency106.4
106.1Defensive Efficiency103.2
-0.6Net Efficiency3.2
-5.0Strength of Schedule0.7
0.3Last 10 Net Efficiency12.9
67.6Tempo64.4
50.2%Effective FG%49.3%
18.9%Turnover Rate14.8%
34.0%Offensive Rebound %24.7%
31.6%Free Throw Rate39.5%
-0.4Average Margin2.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Merrimack HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY84.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.7–42.9), offensive efficiency (106.4–105.5), defensive efficiency (103.2–106.1), net efficiency (3.2–-0.6).
Wagner COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (50.2–49.3), offensive rebounding (34.0–24.7).
Final
Wagner logo
Wagner
71—65
Merrimack logo
Merrimack
Wagner by 6 • 63.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

WagnerTEAM STATMerrimack
25-50FG23-54
50.0%FG%43.0%
3-83PT7-27
38.0%3PT%26.0%
18-23FT12-15
78.0%FT%80.0%
38Rebounds22
8Offensive Rebounds2
12Assists14
10Turnovers5
3Steals6
1Blocks4
14Fouls18

Player Box Score

Wagner
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Melvin Council Jr.G405-141-24-4131200015
Seck ZongoForward225-70-05-970010015
Tahron AllenNot Available315-120-14-422000014
Julian BrownGuard402-41-14-44110009
Javier EzquerraG403-61-41-24700008
Keyontae LewisF153-30-00-05100006
Tyje KeltonF122-40-00-00000004
Merrimack
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jacob O'ConnellForward299-113-35-622040026
Jordan McKoyGuard293-63-52-200200011
Jordan DerkackG333-90-32-47610008
Adam ClarkG294-60-10-02310008
Samba DialloForward282-60-21-12000005
Devon SavageGuard221-121-100-02010003
Jaylen StinsonG190-10-12-25310002
Bryan EtumnuF111-30-20-02000002

Advanced Game Stats

63.5Possessions63.5
111.8Offensive Efficiency102.4
102.4Defensive Efficiency111.8
9.4Net Efficiency-9.4
53.0%Effective FG%49.1%
58.3%True Shooting %53.2%
15.9%Turnover Rate7.8%
46.0%Free Throw Rate27.8%
16.0%3-Point Rate50.0%
1.20Assist / Turnover2.80
Game Summary
Wagner won by 6 points. The game played at approximately 63.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.