East Carolina logo

East Carolina

11-20
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
12.9%East Carolina
87.1%UAB
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUAB -14.3
PROJECTED TOTAL153.2
MODEL MONEYLINEUAB -675
UAB logo

UAB

20-12
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreEast Carolina 69
Projected Total153.2
Projected ScoreUAB 84

Team Comparison

44.3MMH Power Index56.9
102.0Offensive Efficiency110.5
110.5Defensive Efficiency102.9
-8.5Net Efficiency7.6
2.6Strength of Schedule0.4
-1.8Last 10 Net Efficiency2.9
70.1Tempo71.7
46.7%Effective FG%48.8%
17.4%Turnover Rate12.4%
33.9%Offensive Rebound %32.7%
40.2%Free Throw Rate36.9%
-5.9Average Margin5.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

UAB HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY87.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUAB holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.9–44.3), offensive efficiency (110.5–102.0), defensive efficiency (102.9–110.5), net efficiency (7.6–-8.5).
East Carolina COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.6–0.4), offensive rebounding (33.9–32.7), free throw rate (40.2–36.9).
Final
East Carolina logo
East Carolina
61—69
UAB logo
UAB
UAB by 8 • 67.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

East CarolinaTEAM STATUAB
22-60FG25-58
37.0%FG%43.0%
8-243PT5-15
33.0%3PT%33.0%
9-12FT14-18
75.0%FT%78.0%
42Rebounds33
14Offensive Rebounds8
8Assists12
16Turnovers9
5Steals7
3Blocks5
17Fouls10

Player Box Score

East Carolina
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Ezra AusarF355-120-06-9101110016
Brandon JohnsonForward386-133-70-0100100015
RJ FeltonGuard334-122-70-040210010
Jaden WalkerGuard312-71-23-35201008
Cam HayesGuard252-82-70-04100006
Bobby PettifordGuard312-70-10-02410004
Kalib LaCountGuard11-10-00-01000002
Cyr MalongaC60-00-00-01000000
UAB
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Eric GainesGuard405-140-37-878200017
Javian DavisForward377-100-00-290110014
Christian ColemanG243-60-04-471310010
Alejandro VasquezGuard254-111-30-03100009
Daniel OrtizGuard183-72-40-00010008
Butta JohnsonG272-71-41-22100006
Yaxel LendeborgF191-21-12-23003005
Tony ToneyGuard100-10-00-00100000

Advanced Game Stats

67.7Possessions67.7
90.1Offensive Efficiency101.9
101.9Defensive Efficiency90.1
-11.8Net Efficiency11.8
43.3%Effective FG%47.4%
46.4%True Shooting %51.8%
23.6%Turnover Rate13.3%
20.0%Free Throw Rate31.0%
40.0%3-Point Rate25.9%
0.50Assist / Turnover1.33
Game Summary
UAB won by 8 points. The game played at approximately 67.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.