
Tulsa
30-8GAME THAT MATTERSAT
43.7%Tulsa
56.3%SMU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSMU -1.7
PROJECTED TOTAL164.8
MODEL MONEYLINESMU -129

SMU
20-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTulsa 82
Projected Total164.8
Projected ScoreSMU 83
Team Comparison
64.8MMH Power Index62.5
121.1Offensive Efficiency118.2
104.8Defensive Efficiency109.6
16.3Net Efficiency8.6
0.0Strength of Schedule7.0
10.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.3
70.2Tempo71.1
55.4%Effective FG%55.7%
15.4%Turnover Rate15.7%
33.8%Offensive Rebound %35.0%
42.4%Free Throw Rate31.3%
11.5Average Margin6.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Tulsa HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY56.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTulsa holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (64.8–62.5), offensive efficiency (121.1–118.2), defensive efficiency (104.8–109.6), net efficiency (16.3–8.6).
SMU COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (7.0–0.0), shooting efficiency (55.7–55.4), offensive rebounding (35.0–33.8).