Texas A&M logo

Texas A&M

20-12
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
47.9%Texas A&M
52.1%LSU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADLSU -1.2
PROJECTED TOTAL161.4
MODEL MONEYLINELSU -109
LSU logo

LSU

15-17
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTexas A&M 80
Projected Total161.4
Projected ScoreLSU 81

Team Comparison

58MMH Power Index54.2
116.1Offensive Efficiency115.5
108.4Defensive Efficiency111.3
7.7Net Efficiency4.2
4.8Strength of Schedule4.5
-7.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-12.8
69.1Tempo70.5
53.5%Effective FG%53.4%
14.8%Turnover Rate15.6%
31.7%Offensive Rebound %33.2%
37.5%Free Throw Rate41.9%
5.3Average Margin2.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Texas A&M HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY52.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTexas A&M holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.0–54.2), offensive efficiency (116.1–115.5), defensive efficiency (108.4–111.3), net efficiency (7.7–4.2).
LSU COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (33.2–31.7), free throw rate (41.9–37.5).
Final
Texas A&M logo
Texas A&M
73—69
LSU logo
LSU
Texas A&M by 4 • 65.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Texas A&MTEAM STATLSU
26-69FG25-60
38.0%FG%42.0%
10-333PT11-34
30.0%3PT%32.0%
11-20FT8-10
55.0%FT%80.0%
48Rebounds34
21Offensive Rebounds6
11Assists15
6Turnovers8
5Steals1
3Blocks2
10Fouls19

Player Box Score

Texas A&M
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Wade Taylor IVGuard226-174-103-554000019
Tyrece RadfordGuard376-181-62-292100015
Jace CarterNot Available325-132-71-260200013
Andersson GarciaForward323-42-32-2104100010
Solomon WashingtonF342-50-31-57003005
Manny ObasekiGuard61-31-10-21000003
Henry Coleman IIIForward111-10-00-01000002
Eli LawrenceGuard111-50-20-00010002
Wildens LevequeForward80-10-02-22100002
Hayden HefnerGuard71-20-10-03000002
LSU
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jordan WrightGuard346-142-61-2106000015
Jalen CookGuard264-121-63-351100012
Mike Williams IIIG213-103-92-223000011
Jalen ReedF284-72-40-040010010
Tyrell WardG224-82-50-031000010
Will BakerForward162-40-12-31100006
Derek FountainForward141-31-30-01001003
Hunter DeanForward221-20-00-06100002
Trae HannibalGuard170-00-00-01200000

Advanced Game Stats

65.2Possessions65.2
112.0Offensive Efficiency105.8
105.8Defensive Efficiency112.0
6.1Net Efficiency-6.1
44.9%Effective FG%50.8%
46.5%True Shooting %53.3%
9.4%Turnover Rate12.0%
29.0%Free Throw Rate16.7%
47.8%3-Point Rate56.7%
1.83Assist / Turnover1.88
Game Summary
Texas A&M won by 4 points. The game played at approximately 65.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.