North Alabama

9-21

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

12.4%North Alabama

87.6%Lipscomb

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADLipscomb -14.3

PROJECTED TOTAL150.6

MODEL MONEYLINELipscomb -706

Lipscomb

18-13

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreNorth Alabama 68

Projected Total150.6

Projected ScoreLipscomb 82

Team Comparison

North AlabamaMetricLipscomb

34.9MMH Power Index47.9

104.4Offensive Efficiency111.3

116.7Defensive Efficiency107.6

-12.3Net Efficiency3.7

-1.2Strength of Schedule-2.5

-16.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.0

66.5Tempo68.8

48.9%Effective FG%54.8%

17.2%Turnover Rate16.0%

31.5%Offensive Rebound %25.9%

39.1%Free Throw Rate26.5%

-8.2Average Margin2.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Lipscomb HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY87.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLipscomb holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (47.9–34.9), offensive efficiency (111.3–104.4), defensive efficiency (107.6–116.7), net efficiency (3.7–-12.3).

North Alabama COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.2–-2.5), offensive rebounding (31.5–25.9), free throw rate (39.1–26.5).

Final

North Alabama

79—88

Lipscomb

Lipscomb by 9 • 67.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

North AlabamaTEAM STATLipscomb

31-55FG31-54

56.0%FG%57.0%

9-193PT10-18

47.0%3PT%56.0%

8-9FT16-23

89.0%FT%70.0%

21Rebounds31

4Offensive Rebounds10

9Assists15

12Turnovers12

8Steals5

4Blocks4

17Fouls12

Player Box Score

North Alabama

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Damian Forrest	Forward	30	10-13	0-0	1-2	9	0	0	0	21
Jacari Lane	G	29	6-12	2-4	2-2	2	2	1	0	16
KJ Johnson	Guard	30	4-7	1-2	3-3	2	1	1	1	12
Dallas Howell	F	20	3-4	3-4	2-2	3	1	3	1	11
Tim Smith Jr.	Forward	16	3-5	1-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	7
Detalian Brown	Guard	13	2-4	1-3	0-0	0	1	1	0	5
Will Soucie	Guard	12	1-1	1-1	0-0	1	0	0	1	3
Josiah Fulcher	Guard	22	1-6	0-2	0-0	2	2	2	1	2
Canin Jefferson	G	3	1-3	0-1	0-0	0	2	0	0	2
Eoin Nelson	Center	25	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Lipscomb

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Derrin Boyd	Guard	34	5-12	2-3	7-10	6	1	0	0	19
Joe Anderson	Guard	37	7-7	4-4	0-2	0	6	3	1	18
Cody Head	G	35	6-9	0-0	3-3	5	0	1	0	15
AJ McGinnis	Guard	35	5-12	2-7	2-2	1	1	0	0	14
Owen McCormack	Center	21	2-4	1-2	2-2	5	5	0	1	7
Dylan Faulkner	F	16	3-4	0-0	0-0	7	1	0	2	6
Grant Asman	F	12	2-3	0-0	2-4	3	1	0	0	6
TJ Johnson	F	7	1-2	1-2	0-0	0	0	1	0	3
Rylan Houck	Forward	3	0-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

67.1Possessions67.1

117.7Offensive Efficiency131.1

131.1Defensive Efficiency117.7

-13.4Net Efficiency13.4

64.5%Effective FG%66.7%

66.6%True Shooting %67.8%

17.8%Turnover Rate17.9%

16.4%Free Throw Rate42.6%

34.5%3-Point Rate33.3%

0.75Assist / Turnover1.25

Game Summary

Lipscomb won by 9 points. The game played at approximately 67.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.