
Stonehill
12-21GAME THAT MATTERSAT
9.4%Stonehill
90.6%Merrimack
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMerrimack -14.0
PROJECTED TOTAL133.4
MODEL MONEYLINEMerrimack -964

Merrimack
23-11MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreStonehill 60
Projected Total133.4
Projected ScoreMerrimack 74
Team Comparison
37.9MMH Power Index53.7
97.5Offensive Efficiency106.4
100.7Defensive Efficiency103.2
-3.2Net Efficiency3.2
-5.4Strength of Schedule0.7
-3.4Last 10 Net Efficiency12.9
68.1Tempo64.4
48.0%Effective FG%49.3%
19.1%Turnover Rate14.8%
28.4%Offensive Rebound %24.7%
29.2%Free Throw Rate39.5%
-2.2Average Margin2.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Merrimack HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY90.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.7–37.9), offensive efficiency (106.4–97.5), net efficiency (3.2–-3.2), strength of schedule (0.7–-5.4).
Stonehill COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (100.7–103.2), offensive rebounding (28.4–24.7).