Miami logo

Miami

26-9
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
77.7%Miami
22.3%Notre Dame
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMiami -7.8
PROJECTED TOTAL154.1
MODEL MONEYLINEMiami -348
Notre Dame logo

Notre Dame

13-17
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMiami 81
Projected Total154.1
Projected ScoreNotre Dame 73

Team Comparison

65.5MMH Power Index49.7
117.8Offensive Efficiency110.3
103.0Defensive Efficiency111.2
14.8Net Efficiency-0.9
3.6Strength of Schedule4.7
3.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-11.6
69.2Tempo68.0
55.5%Effective FG%53.0%
16.2%Turnover Rate17.0%
37.3%Offensive Rebound %31.4%
37.9%Free Throw Rate34.7%
10.3Average Margin-0.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Miami HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY77.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMiami holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (65.5–49.7), offensive efficiency (117.8–110.3), defensive efficiency (103.0–111.2), net efficiency (14.8–-0.9).
Notre Dame COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (4.7–3.6).
Final
Miami logo
Miami
73—61
Notre Dame logo
Notre Dame
Miami by 12 • 69.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

MiamiTEAM STATNotre Dame
26-53FG23-62
49.0%FG%37.0%
8-233PT10-34
35.0%3PT%29.0%
13-17FT5-6
76.0%FT%83.0%
35Rebounds35
6Offensive Rebounds11
13Assists11
15Turnovers15
9Steals9
3Blocks4
8Fouls16

Player Box Score

Miami
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Norchad OmierForward3612-142-37-9101310033
Kyshawn GeorgeForward363-92-73-454300011
Nijel PackG333-101-43-425010010
Bensley JosephGuard304-72-50-030200010
Wooga PoplarGuard353-61-20-04200007
Matthew ClevelandGuard111-40-20-07111002
Christian WatsonG140-30-00-02000000
Mike NwokoF50-00-00-01000000
Notre Dame
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Markus BurtonG365-153-92-234210015
J.R. KoniecznyF335-153-90-060100013
Braeden ShrewsberryG304-102-70-040100010
Tae DavisF314-90-11-24111009
Julian Roper IIGuard283-51-30-04121007
Carey BoothF121-31-30-01001003
Kebba NjieF140-20-02-25010002
Logan ImesG121-10-00-02410002
Matt ZonaForward40-20-20-00100000

Advanced Game Stats

69.5Possessions69.5
105.0Offensive Efficiency87.8
87.8Defensive Efficiency105.0
17.3Net Efficiency-17.3
56.6%Effective FG%45.2%
59.8%True Shooting %47.0%
21.4%Turnover Rate21.8%
32.1%Free Throw Rate9.7%
43.4%3-Point Rate54.8%
0.87Assist / Turnover0.73
Game Summary
Miami won by 12 points. The game played at approximately 69.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.