Navy logo

Navy

26-8
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
86.3%Navy
13.7%Bucknell
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADNavy -12.2
PROJECTED TOTAL141.2
MODEL MONEYLINENavy -630
Bucknell logo

Bucknell

10-23
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreNavy 77
Projected Total141.2
Projected ScoreBucknell 65

Team Comparison

56.8MMH Power Index35.7
113.2Offensive Efficiency99.5
97.6Defensive Efficiency112.8
15.6Net Efficiency-13.3
-8.1Strength of Schedule2.0
16.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-11.5
65.9Tempo67.7
53.7%Effective FG%48.4%
17.1%Turnover Rate19.0%
33.2%Offensive Rebound %26.6%
40.9%Free Throw Rate30.7%
10.3Average Margin-8.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Navy HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY86.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNavy holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.8–35.7), offensive efficiency (113.2–99.5), defensive efficiency (97.6–112.8), net efficiency (15.6–-13.3).
Bucknell COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.0–-8.1).
Final
Navy logo
Navy
63—71
Bucknell logo
Bucknell
Bucknell by 8 • 59.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

NavyTEAM STATBucknell
19-54FG23-47
35.0%FG%49.0%
7-223PT10-20
32.0%3PT%50.0%
18-27FT15-23
67.0%FT%65.0%
32Rebounds35
14Offensive Rebounds9
8Assists15
7Turnovers11
4Steals3
4Blocks7
21Fouls21

Player Box Score

Navy
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Austin BenigniG397-201-47-1004010022
Mac MacDonaldGuard314-94-90-020000012
Donovan DraperF353-120-25-7111110011
Nyles HowardG232-41-32-24100007
Mike WoodsF191-20-04-62210006
Austin IngeGuard182-31-20-03020005
Aidan KehoeC190-10-00-04002000
Mitch FischerForward70-00-00-21000000
Kam SummersGuard70-10-10-02000000
Jordan PennickG20-20-10-00000000
Bucknell
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jack ForrestGuard399-124-62-571010024
Noah WilliamsonC255-90-14-430020014
Josh AdohGuard193-53-31-254200010
Elvin Edmonds IVGuard383-92-51-34501009
Ian MottaF232-71-20-03000005
Brandon McCreeshG220-00-05-61210005
Ruot BijiekF220-40-32-23200002
Pip AjayiForward121-10-00-14103002

Advanced Game Stats

59.9Possessions59.9
105.2Offensive Efficiency118.5
118.5Defensive Efficiency105.2
-13.4Net Efficiency13.4
41.7%Effective FG%59.6%
47.1%True Shooting %61.3%
11.7%Turnover Rate18.4%
50.0%Free Throw Rate48.9%
40.7%3-Point Rate42.6%
1.14Assist / Turnover1.36
Game Summary
Bucknell won by 8 points. The game played at approximately 59.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Effective FG%, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.