Tulane logo

Tulane

18-15
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
73.7%Tulane
26.3%UTSA
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTulane -5.9
PROJECTED TOTAL150.8
MODEL MONEYLINETulane -280
UTSA logo

UTSA

5-25
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTulane 78
Projected Total150.8
Projected ScoreUTSA 72

Team Comparison

44.3MMH Power Index30.5
105.3Offensive Efficiency99.0
109.9Defensive Efficiency115.0
-4.6Net Efficiency-16.0
2.7Strength of Schedule-1.2
-10.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-17.6
68.7Tempo70.2
49.6%Effective FG%45.9%
15.6%Turnover Rate17.0%
22.8%Offensive Rebound %30.9%
44.8%Free Throw Rate29.9%
-3.2Average Margin-11.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Tulane HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY73.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTulane holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (44.3–30.5), offensive efficiency (105.3–99.0), defensive efficiency (109.9–115.0), net efficiency (-4.6–-16.0).
UTSA COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (30.9–22.8).
Final
Tulane logo
Tulane
88—89
UTSA logo
UTSA
UTSA by 1 • 75.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

TulaneTEAM STATUTSA
29-60FG28-68
48.0%FG%41.0%
12-243PT12-36
50.0%3PT%33.0%
18-29FT21-30
62.0%FT%70.0%
33Rebounds48
7Offensive Rebounds17
13Assists16
9Turnovers9
4Steals2
7Blocks6
21Fouls21

Player Box Score

Tulane
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Kevin Cross, Jr.Forward388-151-46-963100023
Jaylen ForbesGuard277-125-104-542000023
Collin HollowayForward323-62-33-552010011
Tre' WilliamsGuard244-82-21-220100011
Sion JamesGuard383-91-31-56512008
Kolby KingG253-71-21-15110008
Percy DanielsC121-20-00-00004002
Gregg Glenn IIIF40-10-02-20000002
UTSA
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Carlton Linguard Jr.Center3210-166-105-7101030031
Trey EdmondsCenter242-30-07-881010011
Jordan Ivy-CurryGuard273-131-72-25511009
Chandler CuthrellF143-31-12-611100009
Christian TuckerGuard342-91-52-22500007
PJ CarterG143-51-30-00100007
Isaiah WyattGuard242-82-60-03000006
Dre Fuller Jr.Guard211-90-43-54211005
Massal DioufForward102-20-00-03000004

Advanced Game Stats

75.1Possessions75.1
117.2Offensive Efficiency118.5
118.5Defensive Efficiency117.2
-1.3Net Efficiency1.3
58.3%Effective FG%50.0%
59.6%True Shooting %54.1%
11.9%Turnover Rate12.1%
48.3%Free Throw Rate44.1%
40.0%3-Point Rate52.9%
1.44Assist / Turnover1.78
Game Summary
UTSA won by 1 points. The game played at approximately 75.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Effective FG%, True Shooting %, Free Throw Rate.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.