
Merrimack
23-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
66.7%Merrimack
33.3%Wagner
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMerrimack -2.7
PROJECTED TOTAL138.3
MODEL MONEYLINEMerrimack -200

Wagner
14-17MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMerrimack 70
Projected Total138.3
Projected ScoreWagner 68
Team Comparison
53.7MMH Power Index42.9
106.4Offensive Efficiency105.5
103.2Defensive Efficiency106.1
3.2Net Efficiency-0.6
0.7Strength of Schedule-5.0
12.9Last 10 Net Efficiency0.3
64.4Tempo67.6
49.3%Effective FG%50.2%
14.8%Turnover Rate18.9%
24.7%Offensive Rebound %34.0%
39.5%Free Throw Rate31.6%
2.1Average Margin-0.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Merrimack HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY66.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.7–42.9), offensive efficiency (106.4–105.5), defensive efficiency (103.2–106.1), net efficiency (3.2–-0.6).
Wagner COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (50.2–49.3), offensive rebounding (34.0–24.7).