Binghamton

8-22

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

29.6%Binghamton

70.4%Maine

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADMaine -6.4

PROJECTED TOTAL132.5

MODEL MONEYLINEMaine -238

Maine

8-24

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreBinghamton 63

Projected Total132.5

Projected ScoreMaine 69

Team Comparison

BinghamtonMetricMaine

32.4MMH Power Index35.6

102.2Offensive Efficiency95.6

112.3Defensive Efficiency104.6

-10.1Net Efficiency-9.0

-6.0Strength of Schedule-1.8

-6.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.8

64.2Tempo65.4

51.3%Effective FG%50.5%

18.5%Turnover Rate19.0%

21.5%Offensive Rebound %19.4%

42.8%Free Throw Rate38.5%

-6.5Average Margin-5.9

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Binghamton HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY70.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–5

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBinghamton holds the advantage in offensive efficiency (102.2–95.6), recent form (-6.2–-6.8), shooting efficiency (51.3–50.5), ball security (18.5–19.0).

Maine COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (35.6–32.4), defensive efficiency (104.6–112.3), net efficiency (-9.0–-10.1).

Final

Binghamton

51—50

Maine

Binghamton by 1 • 58.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

BinghamtonTEAM STATMaine

22-50FG16-46

44.0%FG%35.0%

1-103PT2-12

10.0%3PT%17.0%

6-10FT16-18

60.0%FT%89.0%

31Rebounds28

8Offensive Rebounds7

17Assists8

11Turnovers12

7Steals6

1Blocks6

15Fouls15

Player Box Score

Binghamton

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Armon Harried	Guard	40	7-13	0-2	1-2	8	4	2	0	15
Nehemiah Benson	Forward	26	5-9	0-0	2-3	3	2	0	0	12
Tariq Balogun	Forward	34	5-8	0-0	1-2	5	4	1	1	11
Dan Petcash	Guard	39	3-8	1-3	0-1	3	1	1	0	7
Symir Torrence	Guard	40	2-6	0-1	2-2	6	5	2	0	6
Chris Walker	G	16	0-5	0-3	0-0	1	1	0	0	0
Gavin Walsh	F	5	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	1	0	0

Maine

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jaden Clayton	G	32	6-10	1-3	2-2	4	1	0	0	15
Quion Burns	Guard	19	5-7	0-1	3-4	3	0	0	0	13
Ja'Shonte Wright-McLeish	Guard	30	2-7	1-5	0-0	2	1	1	0	5
Peter Filipovity	Forward	24	0-3	0-1	5-6	3	0	1	0	5
Kellen Tynes	Guard	37	2-11	0-2	0-0	6	5	2	0	4
Adam Cisse	Forward	26	1-1	0-0	2-2	1	1	0	5	4
AJ Lopez	G	18	0-5	0-0	4-4	1	0	1	1	4
Kristians Feierbergs	Forward	10	0-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	0
Milos Nenadic	C	4	0-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	1	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

58.7Possessions58.7

86.9Offensive Efficiency85.2

85.2Defensive Efficiency86.9

1.7Net Efficiency-1.7

45.0%Effective FG%37.0%

46.6%True Shooting %45.8%

19.0%Turnover Rate20.2%

20.0%Free Throw Rate39.1%

20.0%3-Point Rate26.1%

1.55Assist / Turnover0.67

Game Summary

Binghamton won by 1 points. The game played at approximately 58.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Effective FG%, Net Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.