Mississippi Valley State

3-30

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

4.1%Mississippi Valley State

95.9%Grambling

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADGrambling -22.9

PROJECTED TOTAL144.4

MODEL MONEYLINEGrambling -2339

Grambling

14-19

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreMississippi Valley State 61

Projected Total144.4

Projected ScoreGrambling 84

Team Comparison

Mississippi Valley StateMetricGrambling

17.7MMH Power Index41.4

91.1Offensive Efficiency100.7

117.8Defensive Efficiency100.4

-26.7Net Efficiency0.3

-4.1Strength of Schedule-5.7

-17.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.4

70.5Tempo69.9

45.8%Effective FG%49.2%

21.8%Turnover Rate20.9%

26.5%Offensive Rebound %30.4%

34.5%Free Throw Rate42.2%

-18.8Average Margin0.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Grambling HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY95.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGrambling holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (41.4–17.7), offensive efficiency (100.7–91.1), defensive efficiency (100.4–117.8), net efficiency (0.3–-26.7).

Mississippi Valley State COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-4.1–-5.7).

Final

Mississippi Valley State

46—54

Grambling

Grambling by 8 • 68.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Mississippi Valley StateTEAM STATGrambling

18-45FG17-49

40.0%FG%35.0%

1-73PT3-16

14.0%3PT%19.0%

9-12FT17-25

75.0%FT%68.0%

28Rebounds29

8Offensive Rebounds11

8Assists5

24Turnovers21

11Steals15

3Blocks3

18Fouls13

Player Box Score

Mississippi Valley State

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Rayquan Brown	Guard	38	7-20	1-4	3-4	4	2	0	2	18
Arecko Gipson	Guard	35	3-5	0-0	6-7	8	1	2	0	12
Donovan Sanders	Guard	31	4-8	0-0	0-1	4	2	4	1	8
Reginald Reynolds	Forward	32	2-4	0-2	0-0	4	1	0	0	4
Ernest Minton	Guard	23	1-5	0-1	0-0	4	0	2	0	2
Jordan Johnson	Guard	6	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	0	2
Danny Washington	Guard	18	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	2	1	0	0
George Ivory III	G	9	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	0	0
Walter Hamilton	Forward	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Quorien Waldon	Forward	2	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Markell Petro	Guard	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Chidi Umeh	Guard	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Grambling

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Antwan Burnett	G	36	6-13	2-7	0-2	12	0	4	0	14
Tra'Michael Moton	Guard	21	2-3	0-1	8-8	0	1	4	0	12
Mikale Stevenson	G	27	2-8	1-4	3-3	2	2	0	0	8
Jourdan Smith	Guard	32	2-9	0-1	1-2	2	1	0	2	5
Kintavious Dozier	G	18	2-5	0-2	0-2	1	1	2	0	4
Zahad Munford	Guard	16	2-4	0-1	0-0	1	0	3	0	4
Jimel Cofer Jr.	G	10	0-1	0-0	2-2	3	0	1	0	2
Malik Lamin	Center	6	0-1	0-0	2-2	1	0	0	0	2
Jonathan Aku	Forward	15	0-2	0-0	0-0	4	0	0	1	0

Advanced Game Stats

68.8Possessions68.8

66.9Offensive Efficiency78.5

78.5Defensive Efficiency66.9

-11.6Net Efficiency11.6

41.1%Effective FG%37.8%

45.4%True Shooting %44.4%

36.0%Turnover Rate29.6%

26.7%Free Throw Rate51.0%

15.6%3-Point Rate32.7%

0.33Assist / Turnover0.24

Game Summary

Grambling won by 8 points. The game played at approximately 68.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.