Bradley logo

Bradley

21-13
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
64.7%Bradley
35.3%Indiana State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADBradley -2.7
PROJECTED TOTAL151.4
MODEL MONEYLINEBradley -183
Indiana State logo

Indiana State

11-21
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBradley 77
Projected Total151.4
Projected ScoreIndiana State 74

Team Comparison

54.4MMH Power Index44.4
110.5Offensive Efficiency104.7
105.3Defensive Efficiency106.0
5.2Net Efficiency-1.3
1.6Strength of Schedule0.1
0.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.2
69.9Tempo70.3
51.2%Effective FG%53.6%
13.9%Turnover Rate19.5%
27.7%Offensive Rebound %27.3%
37.2%Free Throw Rate28.8%
3.6Average Margin-0.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Bradley HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY64.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBradley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.4–44.4), offensive efficiency (110.5–104.7), defensive efficiency (105.3–106.0), net efficiency (5.2–-1.3).
Indiana State COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (53.6–51.2).
Final
Bradley logo
Bradley
86—95
Indiana State logo
Indiana State
Indiana State by 9 • 72.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

BradleyTEAM STATIndiana State
34-67FG33-65
51.0%FG%51.0%
12-253PT12-29
48.0%3PT%41.0%
6-8FT17-20
75.0%FT%85.0%
34Rebounds35
8Offensive Rebounds8
9Assists18
9Turnovers6
3Steals4
2Blocks2
18Fouls13

Player Box Score

Bradley
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Duke DeenGuard4311-206-93-444100031
Malevy LeonsForward438-132-50-061110018
Connor HickmanG395-132-71-232000013
Darius HannahForward326-120-00-070100012
Almar AtlasonF303-52-22-211010010
Christian DavisGuard241-20-10-06100002
Demarion BurchG110-10-00-03000000
Kyle ThomasF30-10-10-00000000
Indiana State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Ryan ConwellG447-134-94-432000022
Isaiah SwopeGuard437-183-92-556000019
Robbie AvilaC436-141-35-571320018
Jayson KentForward457-101-32-2161000017
Julian LarryGuard395-82-32-216100014
Xavier BledsonGuard91-21-22-21200005
Masen MillerGuard20-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

72.2Possessions72.2
119.1Offensive Efficiency131.6
131.6Defensive Efficiency119.1
-12.5Net Efficiency12.5
59.7%Effective FG%60.0%
60.7%True Shooting %63.8%
12.5%Turnover Rate8.3%
11.9%Free Throw Rate30.8%
37.3%3-Point Rate44.6%
1.00Assist / Turnover3.00
Game Summary
Indiana State won by 9 points. The game played at approximately 72.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.