Tulsa logo

Tulsa

30-8
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
84.4%Tulsa
15.6%Rice
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTulsa -10.2
PROJECTED TOTAL156.4
MODEL MONEYLINETulsa -541
Rice logo

Rice

13-18
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTulsa 83
Projected Total156.4
Projected ScoreRice 73

Team Comparison

TulsaMetricRice
64.8MMH Power Index45.1
121.1Offensive Efficiency108.3
104.8Defensive Efficiency109.2
16.3Net Efficiency-0.9
0.0Strength of Schedule-2.2
10.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.3
70.2Tempo68.3
55.4%Effective FG%49.7%
15.4%Turnover Rate17.8%
33.8%Offensive Rebound %35.7%
42.4%Free Throw Rate34.7%
11.5Average Margin-0.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Tulsa HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY84.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTulsa holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (64.8–45.1), offensive efficiency (121.1–108.3), defensive efficiency (104.8–109.2), net efficiency (16.3–-0.9).
Rice COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (35.7–33.8).
Final
Tulsa logo
Tulsa
85—83
Rice logo
Rice
Tulsa by 2 • 75.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

TulsaTEAM STATRice
27-49FG30-69
55.0%FG%43.0%
11-233PT13-34
48.0%3PT%38.0%
20-26FT10-15
77.0%FT%67.0%
31Rebounds36
2Offensive Rebounds14
15Assists23
16Turnovers13
8Steals10
6Blocks1
16Fouls19

Player Box Score

Tulsa
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
PJ HaggertyG366-121-18-1054100021
Cobe WilliamsGuard335-83-56-1056400019
Carlous WilliamsF335-63-40-060010013
Jared GarciaF265-93-60-081150013
Jesaiah McWrightG221-41-34-41210007
Matt ReedF143-30-00-03010006
Tyshawn ArchieG111-30-22-20100004
Isaiah BarnesG211-30-10-01100002
Jarred HallF40-10-10-01000000
Rice
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Mekhi MasonG355-154-85-757300019
Travis EveeGuard265-142-73-332100015
Max FiedlerForward367-70-00-0117210014
Alem HuseinovicGuard334-134-100-041100012
Noah ShelbyG163-53-41-202000010
Anthony SeldenGuard214-70-11-34010009
Keanu DawesF212-50-20-03420004
Camp WagnerG50-10-10-00000000
Andrew AkuchieF40-10-00-00000000
Gabe WarrenG30-10-10-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

75.3Possessions75.3
112.9Offensive Efficiency110.2
110.2Defensive Efficiency112.9
2.7Net Efficiency-2.7
66.3%Effective FG%52.9%
69.3%True Shooting %54.5%
21.2%Turnover Rate17.3%
53.1%Free Throw Rate21.7%
46.9%3-Point Rate49.3%
0.94Assist / Turnover1.77
Game Summary
Tulsa won by 2 points. The game played at approximately 75.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, True Shooting %, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.