Quinnipiac logo

Quinnipiac

19-13
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
39.9%Quinnipiac
60.1%Fairfield
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADFairfield -3.3
PROJECTED TOTAL147.7
MODEL MONEYLINEFairfield -151
Fairfield logo

Fairfield

21-13
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQuinnipiac 72
Projected Total147.7
Projected ScoreFairfield 76

Team Comparison

51MMH Power Index50.1
106.8Offensive Efficiency109.6
102.1Defensive Efficiency105.4
4.7Net Efficiency4.2
-2.3Strength of Schedule-3.4
2.2Last 10 Net Efficiency3.3
70.5Tempo67.8
48.9%Effective FG%49.1%
15.6%Turnover Rate15.0%
34.1%Offensive Rebound %36.0%
34.1%Free Throw Rate28.4%
3.4Average Margin2.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Quinnipiac HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY60.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQuinnipiac holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.0–50.1), defensive efficiency (102.1–105.4), net efficiency (4.7–4.2), strength of schedule (-2.3–-3.4).
Fairfield COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (109.6–106.8), recent form (3.3–2.2), shooting efficiency (49.1–48.9).
Final
Quinnipiac logo
Quinnipiac
66—64
Fairfield logo
Fairfield
Quinnipiac by 2 • 70.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

QuinnipiacTEAM STATFairfield
25-53FG23-65
47.0%FG%35.0%
6-203PT5-26
30.0%3PT%19.0%
10-15FT13-19
67.0%FT%68.0%
40Rebounds35
7Offensive Rebounds13
15Assists10
16Turnovers10
6Steals12
2Blocks3
17Fouls11

Player Box Score

Quinnipiac
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Matt BalancGuard325-122-71-233100013
Amarri MonroeF325-91-51-2111110012
Alexis ReyesForward273-81-42-32010009
Rihards VaversF173-61-32-23010009
Paul OtienoF224-40-00-08200008
Doug YoungG162-51-10-21000005
Savion LewisGuard352-60-00-01820004
Richie SpringsForward101-10-02-22001004
JJ RigginsForward80-20-02-22100002
Daemar KellyG10-00-00-00000000
Fairfield
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jalen LeachNot Available387-161-63-353200018
Caleb FieldsGuard387-152-62-431200018
Brycen GoodineGuard273-100-45-761320011
Jasper FloydG323-91-23-494200010
James Johns Jr.Guard162-70-40-13000004
Jack BrownForward91-11-10-02100003
Peyton SmithF320-60-30-01031000
Birima SeckForward80-10-00-01000000

Advanced Game Stats

70.1Possessions70.1
94.2Offensive Efficiency91.3
91.3Defensive Efficiency94.2
2.9Net Efficiency-2.9
52.8%Effective FG%39.2%
54.9%True Shooting %43.2%
23.1%Turnover Rate14.1%
28.3%Free Throw Rate29.2%
37.7%3-Point Rate40.0%
0.94Assist / Turnover1.00
Game Summary
Quinnipiac won by 2 points. The game played at approximately 70.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Effective FG%, True Shooting %, Turnover Rate.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.