Jackson State

12-21

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

18.6%Jackson State

81.4%Florida A&M

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADFlorida A&M -11.5

PROJECTED TOTAL150.9

MODEL MONEYLINEFlorida A&M -438

Florida A&M

14-16

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreJackson State 70

Projected Total150.9

Projected ScoreFlorida A&M 81

Team Comparison

Jackson StateMetricFlorida A&M

30.7MMH Power Index39.4

98.1Offensive Efficiency98.7

117.0Defensive Efficiency105.6

-18.9Net Efficiency-6.9

-0.7Strength of Schedule-3.2

-6.3Last 10 Net Efficiency4.5

71.6Tempo70.6

45.8%Effective FG%49.2%

19.4%Turnover Rate21.6%

29.6%Offensive Rebound %30.5%

37.9%Free Throw Rate38.0%

-13.5Average Margin-4.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Florida A&M HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY81.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMFlorida A&M holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (39.4–30.7), offensive efficiency (98.7–98.1), defensive efficiency (105.6–117.0), net efficiency (-6.9–-18.9).

Jackson State COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-0.7–-3.2), ball security (19.4–21.6).

Final

Jackson State

86—88

Florida A&M

Florida A&M by 2 • 73.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Jackson StateTEAM STATFlorida A&M

32-72FG31-53

44.0%FG%58.0%

12-293PT8-19

41.0%3PT%42.0%

10-10FT18-25

100.0%FT%72.0%

29Rebounds33

11Offensive Rebounds6

9Assists22

9Turnovers14

8Steals5

2Blocks1

18Fouls12

Player Box Score

Jackson State

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Chase Adams	Guard	33	12-20	7-10	4-4	4	2	1	0	35
Ken Evans Jr.	Guard	37	8-20	2-8	0-0	6	4	2	0	18
Zeke Cook	F	30	4-9	0-1	4-4	2	1	1	1	12
Keionte Cornelius	G	14	4-5	2-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	10
Keijuan Johnson	Forward	25	2-7	1-4	0-0	10	0	2	0	5
Keiveon Hunt	G	13	1-4	0-1	2-2	1	1	0	0	4
Treyon Johnson	Center	22	1-3	0-0	0-0	3	1	1	1	2
Coltie Young	Guard	26	0-4	0-3	0-0	1	0	1	0	0

Florida A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Keith Lamar	F	33	11-14	4-7	1-3	3	1	1	0	27
Jordan Chatman	G	29	4-7	2-4	5-6	4	3	0	0	15
Shannon Grant	Center	21	6-9	0-0	1-1	8	1	1	1	13
Jalen Speer	G	36	3-8	0-1	6-8	4	6	1	0	12
Roderick Coffee III	F	26	2-4	1-1	3-5	5	7	2	0	8
Morrell Schramm	Guard	6	2-2	1-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	5
K'Jei Parker	G	22	1-6	0-5	2-2	2	4	0	0	4
Ja'Derryus Eatmon	Forward	16	1-2	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	2
Hantz Louis-Jeune	G	11	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	2

Advanced Game Stats

73.9Possessions73.9

116.4Offensive Efficiency119.1

119.1Defensive Efficiency116.4

-2.7Net Efficiency2.7

52.8%Effective FG%66.0%

56.0%True Shooting %67.8%

12.0%Turnover Rate19.2%

13.9%Free Throw Rate47.2%

40.3%3-Point Rate35.8%

1.00Assist / Turnover1.57

Game Summary

Florida A&M won by 2 points. The game played at approximately 73.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Effective FG%, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.