Louisville

24-11

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

57.3%Louisville

42.7%Clemson

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADLouisville -1.5

PROJECTED TOTAL147.4

MODEL MONEYLINELouisville -134

Clemson

24-10

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreLouisville 74

Projected Total147.4

Projected ScoreClemson 73

Team Comparison

LouisvilleMetricClemson

67.1MMH Power Index59.9

118.6Offensive Efficiency112.6

102.2Defensive Efficiency101.4

16.4Net Efficiency11.2

6.0Strength of Schedule4.6

1.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7

71.0Tempo63.6

56.9%Effective FG%53.0%

16.8%Turnover Rate14.0%

32.3%Offensive Rebound %27.0%

34.1%Free Throw Rate38.1%

11.7Average Margin7.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Louisville HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY57.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLouisville holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (67.1–59.9), offensive efficiency (118.6–112.6), net efficiency (16.4–11.2), strength of schedule (6.0–4.6).

Clemson COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (101.4–102.2), ball security (14.0–16.8), free throw rate (38.1–34.1).

Final

Louisville

64—70

Clemson

Clemson by 6 • 70.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

LouisvilleTEAM STATClemson

22-64FG22-51

34.0%FG%43.0%

2-203PT5-22

10.0%3PT%23.0%

18-23FT21-25

78.0%FT%84.0%

48Rebounds29

21Offensive Rebounds4

4Assists13

16Turnovers13

7Steals4

—Blocks6

20Fouls20

Player Box Score

Louisville

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Tre White	G	36	11-20	1-6	6-6	14	2	2	29
Mike James	G	39	1-12	1-5	5-6	2	1	0	8
Brandon Huntley-Hatfield	Forward	28	2-9	0-0	3-4	9	0	1	7
Emmanuel Okorafor	F	14	2-2	0-0	1-2	6	0	0	5
Curtis Williams Jr.	G	24	2-8	0-5	0-0	0	1	1	4
Kaleb Glenn	F	20	1-3	0-0	2-2	3	0	1	4
Skyy Clark	G	19	2-7	0-4	0-0	4	0	1	4
Zan Payne	Guard	10	1-2	0-0	1-3	4	0	1	3
Danilo Jovanovich	F	10	0-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0

Clemson

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
PJ Hall	Center	33	9-20	0-6	7-8	5	1	0	1	25
Chase Hunter	Guard	35	5-8	2-4	4-5	1	2	1	0	16
Joseph Girard III	Guard	29	3-12	2-7	5-5	2	1	0	0	13
Chauncey Wiggins	F	33	2-6	1-3	2-2	7	4	0	3	7
Ian Schieffelin	Forward	25	1-1	0-0	2-2	8	2	1	1	4
Jack Clark	Forward	8	1-2	0-1	0-0	2	1	0	0	2
RJ Godfrey	F	5	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	1	0	2
Joshua Beadle	G	14	0-1	0-1	1-2	1	2	0	0	1
Dillon Hunter	G	12	0-0	0-0	0-1	1	0	1	0	0
Bas Leyte	Forward	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	1	0

Advanced Game Stats

70.9Possessions70.9

90.3Offensive Efficiency98.7

98.7Defensive Efficiency90.3

-8.5Net Efficiency8.5

35.9%Effective FG%48.0%

42.7%True Shooting %55.7%

22.9%Turnover Rate18.1%

35.9%Free Throw Rate49.0%

31.3%3-Point Rate43.1%

0.25Assist / Turnover1.00

Game Summary

Clemson won by 6 points. The game played at approximately 70.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.