Wake Forest logo

Wake Forest

18-17
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
57.0%Wake Forest
43.0%Pittsburgh
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADWake Forest -0.7
PROJECTED TOTAL150.8
MODEL MONEYLINEWake Forest -133
Pittsburgh logo

Pittsburgh

13-20
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreWake Forest 76
Projected Total150.8
Projected ScorePittsburgh 75

Team Comparison

57.6MMH Power Index50.5
112.4Offensive Efficiency108.4
109.7Defensive Efficiency110.4
2.7Net Efficiency-2.0
7.2Strength of Schedule5.5
-0.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.9
70.2Tempo65.0
52.8%Effective FG%51.4%
15.5%Turnover Rate17.3%
30.0%Offensive Rebound %33.1%
36.1%Free Throw Rate31.2%
1.9Average Margin-1.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Wake Forest HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY57.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWake Forest holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (57.6–50.5), offensive efficiency (112.4–108.4), defensive efficiency (109.7–110.4), net efficiency (2.7–-2.0).
Pittsburgh COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (33.1–30.0).
Final
Wake Forest logo
Wake Forest
72—77
Pittsburgh logo
Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh by 5 • 68.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Wake ForestTEAM STATPittsburgh
28-60FG26-57
47.0%FG%46.0%
6-223PT8-19
27.0%3PT%42.0%
10-12FT17-21
83.0%FT%81.0%
35Rebounds29
12Offensive Rebounds9
9Assists7
15Turnovers10
4Steals11
5Blocks4
19Fouls14

Player Box Score

Wake Forest
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Hunter SallisGuard379-202-72-263110022
Efton Reid IIIForward377-110-10-0102110014
Boopie MillerG304-80-13-411100011
Andrew CarrForward334-82-50-031130010
Damari MonsantoGuard101-11-13-32100006
Parker FriedrichsenG161-61-62-32000005
Cameron HildrethGuard342-50-10-07100004
Zach KellerF30-10-00-01000000
Pittsburgh
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Bub CarringtonGuard407-152-78-954100024
Ishmael LeggettGuard319-164-60-152300022
Blake HinsonForward366-102-43-420000017
Jaland LoweG361-80-14-44120006
Federiko FederikoF302-60-02-37023006
Will JeffressF121-10-00-02010002
Zack AustinForward130-10-10-01021000
Guillermo Diaz GrahamF20-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

68.4Possessions68.4
105.3Offensive Efficiency112.6
112.6Defensive Efficiency105.3
-7.3Net Efficiency7.3
51.7%Effective FG%52.6%
54.8%True Shooting %57.5%
21.8%Turnover Rate14.7%
20.0%Free Throw Rate36.8%
36.7%3-Point Rate33.3%
0.60Assist / Turnover0.70
Game Summary
Pittsburgh won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 68.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.