Wofford

19-13

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

24.2%Wofford

75.8%Samford

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADSamford -7.7

PROJECTED TOTAL158.2

MODEL MONEYLINESamford -313

Samford

18-14

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreWofford 75

Projected Total158.2

Projected ScoreSamford 83

Team Comparison

WoffordMetricSamford

48.4MMH Power Index54.1

115.2Offensive Efficiency113.5

112.8Defensive Efficiency108.3

2.4Net Efficiency5.2

-3.1Strength of Schedule-2.9

-3.2Last 10 Net Efficiency14.0

68.3Tempo69.5

53.3%Effective FG%54.0%

13.7%Turnover Rate13.3%

30.7%Offensive Rebound %25.3%

37.0%Free Throw Rate42.5%

1.6Average Margin3.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Samford HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY75.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSamford holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.1–48.4), defensive efficiency (108.3–112.8), net efficiency (5.2–2.4), strength of schedule (-2.9–-3.1).

Wofford COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (115.2–113.5), offensive rebounding (30.7–25.3).

Final

Wofford

79—81

Samford

Samford by 2 • 65.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

WoffordTEAM STATSamford

30-61FG29-57

49.0%FG%51.0%

17-333PT12-26

52.0%3PT%46.0%

2-4FT11-14

50.0%FT%79.0%

32Rebounds28

12Offensive Rebounds9

23Assists20

15Turnovers11

6Steals9

2Blocks4

14Fouls11

Player Box Score

Wofford

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Chase Cormier	G	16	5-6	5-6	0-0	1	2	0	0	15
Dillon Bailey	Guard	26	5-9	4-6	0-0	1	1	0	0	14
Kyler Filewich	Center	28	5-9	0-0	0-2	10	6	1	0	10
Corey Tripp	Guard	26	3-13	2-7	2-2	5	3	2	0	10
Anthony Arrington Jr.	G	18	3-6	2-4	0-0	1	0	2	0	8
Jackson Sivills	Guard	21	3-6	1-3	0-0	2	3	0	0	7
Quentin Meza	G	19	2-5	2-5	0-0	1	5	0	0	6
Chase Martin	G	20	2-3	1-2	0-0	4	3	0	1	5
Belal El Shakery	F	11	2-3	0-0	0-0	4	0	1	1	4
Jeremy Lorenz	F	15	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Samford

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jaden Campbell	Guard	31	7-11	3-5	1-1	1	2	1	0	18
Rylan Jones	Guard	32	6-9	3-5	0-0	3	4	0	0	15
Dallas Graziani	Guard	23	5-7	3-4	2-3	2	3	2	0	15
Garrett Hicks	Guard	19	4-6	3-4	1-1	1	0	1	1	12
Achor Achor	F	31	3-7	0-1	1-3	8	8	1	2	7
AJ Staton-McCray	G	24	2-6	0-2	2-2	4	1	1	1	6
Riley Allenspach	F	9	1-3	0-0	2-2	1	1	0	0	4
Lukas Walls	G	8	1-1	0-0	2-2	1	1	0	0	4
Nathan Johnson	Forward	14	0-3	0-2	0-0	3	0	1	0	0
Josh Holloway	G	6	0-2	0-1	0-0	1	0	2	0	0
Chandler Leopard	Guard	3	0-2	0-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

65.8Possessions65.8

120.1Offensive Efficiency123.1

123.1Defensive Efficiency120.1

-3.0Net Efficiency3.0

63.1%Effective FG%61.4%

62.8%True Shooting %63.6%

22.8%Turnover Rate16.8%

6.6%Free Throw Rate24.6%

54.1%3-Point Rate45.6%

1.53Assist / Turnover1.82

Game Summary

Samford won by 2 points. The game played at approximately 65.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Turnover Rate.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.