NJIT

16-17

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

54.3%NJIT

45.7%Binghamton

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADBinghamton -0.2

PROJECTED TOTAL138.4

MODEL MONEYLINENJIT -119

Binghamton

8-22

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreNJIT 69

Projected Total138.4

Projected ScoreBinghamton 69

Team Comparison

NJITMetricBinghamton

38.5MMH Power Index32.4

98.1Offensive Efficiency102.2

107.2Defensive Efficiency112.3

-9.1Net Efficiency-10.1

-0.5Strength of Schedule-6.0

-5.8Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.2

68.3Tempo64.2

47.0%Effective FG%51.3%

16.9%Turnover Rate18.5%

26.9%Offensive Rebound %21.5%

34.0%Free Throw Rate42.8%

-6.2Average Margin-6.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

NJIT HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY54.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNJIT holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (38.5–32.4), defensive efficiency (107.2–112.3), net efficiency (-9.1–-10.1), strength of schedule (-0.5–-6.0).

Binghamton COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (102.2–98.1), shooting efficiency (51.3–47.0), free throw rate (42.8–34.0).

Final

NJIT

66—75

Binghamton

Binghamton by 9 • 63.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

NJITTEAM STATBinghamton

23-57FG28-58

40.0%FG%48.0%

8-243PT3-15

33.0%3PT%20.0%

12-18FT16-22

67.0%FT%73.0%

31Rebounds40

9Offensive Rebounds12

9Assists14

6Turnovers7

5Steals3

2Blocks4

17Fouls13

Player Box Score

NJIT

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tariq Francis	G	37	7-17	4-10	3-6	5	1	1	0	21
Mekhi Gray	G	32	5-12	0-2	2-2	8	1	2	0	12
Justin Anderson	Guard	5	3-4	2-2	0-0	1	0	1	0	8
Adam Hess	Guard	33	2-9	2-7	0-0	3	1	0	0	6
Daniel Schreier	Forward	18	3-3	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	6
Kjell de Graaf	Forward	16	0-0	0-0	6-6	2	1	0	1	6
Levi Lawal	F	11	2-4	0-0	0-2	2	0	0	1	4
Sebastian Robinson	G	25	1-6	0-1	1-2	2	2	1	0	3
Jeffrey Akintolu	F	17	0-1	0-1	0-0	3	1	0	0	0
Jake Goldberg	Guard	6	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	1	0	0	0
Jalen Robinson	Guard	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	0

Binghamton

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Nehemiah Benson	Forward	30	7-11	0-1	2-2	8	1	1	0	16
Tariq Balogun	Forward	24	4-8	0-0	6-9	3	1	0	1	14
Tymu Chenery	Guard	14	5-10	1-4	1-1	2	0	0	0	12
Armon Harried	Guard	36	5-8	0-1	1-4	9	2	1	2	11
Dan Petcash	Guard	37	3-8	1-3	2-2	7	0	0	0	9
Chris Walker	G	14	2-6	1-4	4-4	1	1	0	0	9
Symir Torrence	Guard	39	2-6	0-1	0-0	6	9	1	1	4
Gavin Walsh	F	6	0-1	0-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

63.1Possessions63.1

104.6Offensive Efficiency118.9

118.9Defensive Efficiency104.6

-14.3Net Efficiency14.3

47.4%Effective FG%50.9%

50.3%True Shooting %54.8%

9.6%Turnover Rate11.0%

31.6%Free Throw Rate37.9%

42.1%3-Point Rate25.9%

1.50Assist / Turnover2.00

Game Summary

Binghamton won by 9 points. The game played at approximately 63.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.