
Tulane
18-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
7.3%Tulane
92.7%SMU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSMU -17.2
PROJECTED TOTAL158.0
MODEL MONEYLINESMU -1270

SMU
20-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTulane 70
Projected Total158.0
Projected ScoreSMU 88
Team Comparison
44.3MMH Power Index62.5
105.3Offensive Efficiency118.2
109.9Defensive Efficiency109.6
-4.6Net Efficiency8.6
2.7Strength of Schedule7.0
-10.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.3
68.7Tempo71.1
49.6%Effective FG%55.7%
15.6%Turnover Rate15.7%
22.8%Offensive Rebound %35.0%
44.8%Free Throw Rate31.3%
-3.2Average Margin6.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
SMU HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY92.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSMU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (62.5–44.3), offensive efficiency (118.2–105.3), defensive efficiency (109.6–109.9), net efficiency (8.6–-4.6).
Tulane COUNTERS WITHball security (15.6–15.7), free throw rate (44.8–31.3).