UT Rio Grande Valley

19-14

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

60.8%UT Rio Grande Valley

39.2%Utah Tech

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUT Rio Grande Valley -1.9

PROJECTED TOTAL150.2

MODEL MONEYLINEUT Rio Grande Valley -155

Utah Tech

19-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 76

Projected Total150.2

Projected ScoreUtah Tech 74

Team Comparison

UT Rio Grande ValleyMetricUtah Tech

55.8MMH Power Index47.3

112.6Offensive Efficiency108.8

103.1Defensive Efficiency106.1

9.5Net Efficiency2.7

-1.9Strength of Schedule-2.3

12.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-2.0

67.4Tempo70.6

55.7%Effective FG%54.4%

17.9%Turnover Rate17.5%

29.2%Offensive Rebound %28.1%

29.6%Free Throw Rate32.8%

6.4Average Margin1.9

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UT Rio Grande Valley HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY60.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Rio Grande Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.8–47.3), offensive efficiency (112.6–108.8), defensive efficiency (103.1–106.1), net efficiency (9.5–2.7).

Utah Tech COUNTERS WITHball security (17.5–17.9), free throw rate (32.8–29.6).

Final

UT Rio Grande Valley

64—81

Utah Tech

Utah Tech by 17 • 70.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UT Rio Grande ValleyTEAM STATUtah Tech

22-56FG31-59

39.0%FG%53.0%

4-163PT10-22

25.0%3PT%45.0%

16-25FT9-13

64.0%FT%69.0%

27Rebounds41

7Offensive Rebounds10

6Assists20

8Turnovers17

8Steals3

4Blocks8

16Fouls21

Player Box Score

UT Rio Grande Valley

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
J.J. Howard	Guard	34	8-14	0-0	3-5	3	2	3	1	19
CJ Booker	PG	32	7-14	3-8	2-4	2	2	1	0	19
Daylen Williams	Forward	30	2-3	1-1	4-4	3	1	1	1	9
Saliou Seye	F	20	1-2	0-0	6-8	3	0	1	1	8
Alex Horiuk	F	6	2-4	0-0	0-0	4	0	0	0	4
Elijah Elliott	G	32	1-9	0-5	0-2	1	1	0	1	2
Sherman Brashear	Guard	6	1-3	0-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Ahren Freeman	Forward	11	0-2	0-0	1-2	1	0	0	0	1
Roy Jones III	Guard	16	0-2	0-0	0-0	2	0	1	0	0
Isaiah Barganier	F	13	0-3	0-0	0-0	1	0	1	0	0

Utah Tech

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Aric Demings	Guard	23	5-6	1-1	1-1	1	2	0	0	12
Tennessee Rainwater	F	17	4-6	1-2	3-6	1	0	1	1	12
Noa Gonsalves	Guard	36	4-8	3-5	0-0	4	3	0	0	11
Tanner Christensen	Center	31	5-9	0-0	1-1	11	4	0	2	11
Jaylen Searles	G	23	4-10	2-7	1-2	6	4	0	0	11
Hamed Olayinka	F	23	4-7	0-0	0-0	3	1	0	3	8
Caleb Stearman	Forward	23	2-4	1-1	3-3	8	2	0	2	8
Unisa Turay	Guard	12	2-4	1-2	0-0	3	3	2	0	5
Angelo Kambala	Guard	10	1-4	1-3	0-0	1	1	0	0	3
Trey Hall	F	2	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

70.6Possessions70.6

90.7Offensive Efficiency114.7

114.7Defensive Efficiency90.7

-24.1Net Efficiency24.1

42.9%Effective FG%61.0%

47.1%True Shooting %62.1%

11.6%Turnover Rate23.6%

44.6%Free Throw Rate22.0%

28.6%3-Point Rate37.3%

0.75Assist / Turnover1.18

Game Summary

Utah Tech won by 17 points. The game played at approximately 70.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.