UC Irvine

23-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

69.4%UC Irvine

30.6%Cal Poly

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUC Irvine -6.2

PROJECTED TOTAL160.0

MODEL MONEYLINEUC Irvine -227

Cal Poly

14-19

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUC Irvine 83

Projected Total160.0

Projected ScoreCal Poly 77

Team Comparison

UC IrvineMetricCal Poly

58.4MMH Power Index46.5

106.9Offensive Efficiency107.2

95.0Defensive Efficiency111.0

11.9Net Efficiency-3.8

-1.0Strength of Schedule1.7

10.0Last 10 Net Efficiency2.4

72.3Tempo76.6

50.7%Effective FG%52.2%

17.6%Turnover Rate19.8%

33.1%Offensive Rebound %29.9%

36.5%Free Throw Rate35.8%

8.6Average Margin-2.9

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UC Irvine HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY69.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUC Irvine holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.4–46.5), defensive efficiency (95.0–111.0), net efficiency (11.9–-3.8), recent form (10.0–2.4).

Cal Poly COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (107.2–106.9), strength of schedule (1.7–-1.0), shooting efficiency (52.2–50.7).

Final

UC Irvine

73—59

Cal Poly

UC Irvine by 14 • 65.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UC IrvineTEAM STATCal Poly

28-63FG24-58

44.0%FG%41.0%

6-143PT5-12

43.0%3PT%42.0%

11-12FT6-9

92.0%FT%67.0%

40Rebounds33

15Offensive Rebounds12

15Assists8

11Turnovers16

7Steals5

5Blocks6

12Fouls14

Player Box Score

UC Irvine

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Derin Saran	G	20	6-12	3-4	2-2	1	1	4	0	17
Devin Tillis	F	28	7-9	1-2	0-0	9	2	0	0	15
Andre Henry	G	28	2-6	1-3	4-4	2	0	0	0	9
Justin Hohn	Guard	26	3-10	1-4	2-2	3	3	1	0	9
Dean Keeler	Forward	16	3-9	0-0	2-2	9	1	0	3	8
Carter Welling	F	11	3-6	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	0	6
Pierre Crockrell II	Guard	24	2-3	0-0	0-0	4	7	0	0	4
Bent Leuchten	Center	12	1-4	0-0	1-2	2	0	0	2	3
Langston Redfield	G	11	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	1	1	0	2
Dylan Thoerner	Guard	12	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Ofure Ujadughele	Guard	12	0-2	0-0	0-0	2	0	1	0	0

Cal Poly

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Kobe Sanders	Guard	35	9-17	3-4	2-2	5	4	1	0	23
Joel Armotrading	C	24	3-6	0-0	3-4	4	1	1	1	9
Quentin Jones	G	32	4-12	0-1	0-0	2	1	0	0	8
Aidan Prukop	Guard	25	3-8	1-2	0-0	1	1	0	1	7
Hayden Jory	Guard	14	1-1	1-1	0-0	3	0	1	0	3
Paul Bizimana	Forward	29	1-5	0-1	0-0	8	0	0	1	2
Justin Page	G	16	1-2	0-1	0-0	2	1	0	1	2
Tuukka Jaakkola	Forward	6	1-1	0-0	0-1	0	0	0	0	2
Cole Haller	Forward	5	1-3	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	1	2
Aaron Price Jr.	PF	14	0-3	0-1	1-2	1	0	2	1	1

Advanced Game Stats

65.5Possessions65.5

111.5Offensive Efficiency90.1

90.1Defensive Efficiency111.5

21.4Net Efficiency-21.4

49.2%Effective FG%45.7%

53.1%True Shooting %47.4%

17.0%Turnover Rate24.1%

19.0%Free Throw Rate15.5%

22.2%3-Point Rate20.7%

1.36Assist / Turnover0.50

Game Summary

UC Irvine won by 14 points. The game played at approximately 65.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.