Kent State

24-10

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

51.2%Kent State

48.8%Buffalo

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADBuffalo -0.2

PROJECTED TOTAL163.4

MODEL MONEYLINEKent State -105

Buffalo

17-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreKent State 82

Projected Total163.4

Projected ScoreBuffalo 82

Team Comparison

Kent StateMetricBuffalo

54.7MMH Power Index49.7

113.9Offensive Efficiency114.9

107.6Defensive Efficiency112.2

6.3Net Efficiency2.7

-0.1Strength of Schedule0.0

2.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.9

74.0Tempo67.9

53.0%Effective FG%56.1%

17.7%Turnover Rate16.1%

35.0%Offensive Rebound %27.6%

43.5%Free Throw Rate40.4%

4.7Average Margin1.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Kent State HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY51.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMKent State holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.7–49.7), defensive efficiency (107.6–112.2), net efficiency (6.3–2.7), recent form (2.1–-5.9).

Buffalo COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (114.9–113.9), strength of schedule (0.0–-0.1), shooting efficiency (56.1–53.0).

Final

Kent State

83—52

Buffalo

Kent State by 31 • 66.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Kent StateTEAM STATBuffalo

31-58FG18-56

53.0%FG%32.0%

14-243PT6-28

58.0%3PT%21.0%

7-9FT10-12

78.0%FT%83.0%

46Rebounds22

14Offensive Rebounds7

19Assists11

18Turnovers11

7Steals8

5Blocks7

15Fouls12

Player Box Score

Kent State

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Giovanni Santiago	Guard	34	6-9	5-6	0-0	6	10	3	0	17
Jalen Sullinger	Guard	24	6-10	5-7	0-0	2	1	0	0	17
VonCameron Davis	Forward	27	4-10	1-2	1-1	7	1	1	1	10
Chris Payton Jr.	Forward	19	5-9	0-0	0-0	4	1	0	1	10
Reggie Bass	Guard	18	2-4	1-3	4-4	4	0	0	0	9
Cli'Ron Hornbeak	Center	17	4-6	0-0	1-2	7	0	1	2	9
Mike Bekelja	Guard	26	3-5	2-4	0-0	3	3	1	0	8
Julius Rollins	G	17	1-1	0-0	1-2	3	3	0	1	3
Donovan Hunter	F	7	0-2	0-1	0-0	2	0	1	0	0
Magnus Entenmann	F	4	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
LA Hayes	G	4	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Jake Snyder	Guard	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Buffalo

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Sy Chatman	Forward	30	4-17	2-10	2-2	2	2	2	1	12
Isaiah Adams	Guard	30	4-10	1-6	3-4	1	3	1	0	12
Shawn Fulcher	Guard	23	5-8	1-3	0-0	2	0	1	0	11
Anquan Boldin Jr.	G	34	2-8	0-3	3-4	5	1	2	1	7
Ryan Sabol	G	31	2-5	1-3	0-0	1	3	2	1	5
Bryson Wilson	G	16	1-2	1-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	3
Jonnivius Smith	Forward	13	0-4	0-1	2-2	1	0	0	2	2
Lloyd McVeigh	Guard	13	0-2	0-1	0-0	2	1	0	0	0
Zaakir Williamson	F	10	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	2	0

Advanced Game Stats

66.0Possessions66.0

125.8Offensive Efficiency78.8

78.8Defensive Efficiency125.8

47.0Net Efficiency-47.0

65.5%Effective FG%37.5%

66.6%True Shooting %42.1%

27.2%Turnover Rate16.7%

15.5%Free Throw Rate21.4%

41.4%3-Point Rate50.0%

1.06Assist / Turnover1.00

Game Summary

Kent State won by 31 points. The game played at approximately 66.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.