Wagner logo

Wagner

14-17
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
51.2%Wagner
48.8%Stonehill
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADStonehill -1.0
PROJECTED TOTAL138.3
MODEL MONEYLINEWagner -105
Stonehill logo

Stonehill

12-21
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreWagner 69
Projected Total138.3
Projected ScoreStonehill 70

Team Comparison

42.9MMH Power Index37.9
105.5Offensive Efficiency97.5
106.1Defensive Efficiency100.7
-0.6Net Efficiency-3.2
-5.0Strength of Schedule-5.4
0.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-3.4
67.6Tempo68.1
50.2%Effective FG%48.0%
18.9%Turnover Rate19.1%
34.0%Offensive Rebound %28.4%
31.6%Free Throw Rate29.2%
-0.4Average Margin-2.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Wagner HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY51.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWagner holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (42.9–37.9), offensive efficiency (105.5–97.5), net efficiency (-0.6–-3.2), strength of schedule (-5.0–-5.4).
Stonehill COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (100.7–106.1).
Final
Wagner logo
Wagner
61—71
Stonehill logo
Stonehill
Stonehill by 10 • 61.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

WagnerTEAM STATStonehill
21-57FG25-49
37.0%FG%51.0%
8-323PT10-24
25.0%3PT%42.0%
11-14FT11-15
79.0%FT%73.0%
32Rebounds34
11Offensive Rebounds7
15Assists14
9Turnovers12
7Steals4
1Blocks2
17Fouls11

Player Box Score

Wagner
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Melvin Council Jr.G406-133-74-573010019
Tahron AllenNot Available355-121-33-463100014
Javier EzquerraG404-123-100-056200011
Seck ZongoForward242-40-13-35210007
Keyontae LewisF163-30-01-23110007
Julian BrownGuard301-101-80-01010003
Tyje KeltonF150-30-30-01010000
Stonehill
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Max ZegarowskiForward408-142-72-362000020
Tony FelderGuard343-63-42-384300011
Jackson BenigniG332-82-65-631000011
Todd BrognaF333-51-12-35210009
Pano PavlidisForward214-50-10-01102008
Louie Semona IIIF122-52-50-02300006
Thatcher StoneG152-40-00-03000004
Neal MarquardtForward91-20-00-01000002
Nathan McGillGuard30-00-00-00100000

Advanced Game Stats

61.4Possessions61.4
99.3Offensive Efficiency115.6
115.6Defensive Efficiency99.3
-16.3Net Efficiency16.3
43.9%Effective FG%61.2%
47.9%True Shooting %63.3%
14.6%Turnover Rate19.6%
24.6%Free Throw Rate30.6%
56.1%3-Point Rate49.0%
1.67Assist / Turnover1.17
Game Summary
Stonehill won by 10 points. The game played at approximately 61.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Effective FG%, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.